Table 4 Factors associated with impaired mental health status during the lockdown (N = 4018)
Bivariate regression analysis | Multivariate logistic regression analysis R2 = 0.19 – H&L = 0.1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P value | OR | 95% CI | P value | |
Gender (female vs male) | 2.0 | 1.7–2.3 | < 0.001 | 1.5 | 1.3–1.9 | < 0.001 |
Age | 01.0 | 0.9–1.0 | < 0.001 | |||
Home location (ref: urban vs rural area) | 1.2 | 1.0–1.3 | 0.06 | |||
Financial aid scholarship (ref: scholarship vs none) | 1.1 | 1.0–1.3 | 0.13 | |||
Access to a private outside area from home | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||
Private domestic garden | 1 | 1 | ||||
Private balcony, courtyard or terrace | 1.2 | 0.9–1.4 | 1.2 | 0.96–1.5 | ||
Courtyard or garden for collective use | 1.1 | 0.9–1.5 | 1.3 | 0.9–1.8 | ||
No access | 1.5 | 1.3–1.9 | 1.8 | 1.4–2.2 | ||
Difficulty isolating at home (Yes vs No) | 2.3 | 2.0–2.7 | < 0.001 | 1.4 | 1.2–1.7 | 0.0005 |
Tensions and conflicts at home (Yes vs No) | 2.8 | 2.4–3.2 | < 0.001 | 2.1 | 1.8–2.6 | < 0.001 |
Noises outside the home (Yes vs No) | 1.9 | 1.6–2.2 | < 0.001 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.6 | 0.002 |
Noises inside the home (Yes vs No) | 2.6 | 2.2–3.0 | < 0.001 | 1.5 | 1.2–1.8 | < 0.001 |
Someone infected with SARS-COV2 at home (ref: no) | < 0.001 | 0.005 | ||||
Confirmed and hospitalized cases | 3.4 | 1.6–7.4 | 3.1 | 1.3–7.2 | ||
Confirmed and non-hospitalized cases | 1.5 | 1.1–2.2 | 1.6 | 1.1–2.3 | ||
Suspected cases | 1.4 | 1.1–1.7 | 1.2 | 0.9–1.5 | ||
Relative or acquaintance infected with SARS-COV19 (ref: no) | < 0.001 | |||||
Confirmed and hospitalized cases | 1.6 | 1.3–2.0 | ||||
Confirmed and non-hospitalized cases | 1.4 | 1.1–1.6 | ||||
Suspected cases | 1.4 | 1.1–1.7 | ||||
Frequency of exiting the home during lockdown (ref: never or less than once a week) | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||
Several times a day | 0.6 | 0.4–0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4–0.9 | ||
Once a day | 0.7 | 0.5–0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5–0.9 | ||
Several times a week | 0.7 | 0.6–0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6–0.9 | ||
Once a week | 0.8 | 0.6–0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6–0.9 | ||
Bivariate regression analysis | Multivariate logistic regression analysis R2 = 0.19 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P value | OR | 95% CI | P value | |
Online teaching delivery (ref: none) | 0.01 | |||||
Partial online teaching | 1.1 | 0.9–1.3 | ||||
Total online teaching | 0.9 | 0.7–1.0 | ||||
Time working at home (ref: no change) | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||||
Increased time working | 1.1 | 0.9–1.4 | 1.0 | 0.8–1.3 | ||
Reduced time working | 1.9 | 1.6–2.2 | 1.6 | 1.3–1.9 | ||
Postponement of final competition (Yes vs No) | 1.4 | 1.1–1.7 | 0.0025 | |||
Alcohol consumption (ref: none) | 0.0392 | |||||
No change | 0.9 | 0.7–1.1 | ||||
Increased consumption | 1.3 | 1.0–1.6 | ||||
Reduced consumption | 1.0 | 0.8–1.2 | ||||
Tobacco consumption (ref: none) | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||
No change | 1.3 | 0.8–2.0 | 1.3 | 0.8–2.0 | ||
Increased consumption | 1.6 | 1.2–2.1 | 1.6 | 1.2–2.1 | ||
Reduced consumption | 0.9 | 0.7–1.3 | 0.9 | 0.7–1.3 | ||
Media entertainment (ref: not used) ¥ | < 0.0001 | 0.0006 | ||||
1-Ineffective | 3.5 | 1.9–6.5 | 2.5 | 1.2–4.9 | ||
Reading entertainment (ref: not used) ¥ | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||||
1-Ineffective | 1.9 | 1.4–2.6 | 1.5 | 1.04–2.1 | ||
2 | 1.6 | 1.3–2.1 | 1.7 | 1.3–2.2 | ||
Physical exercise (ref: not used) ¥ | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||||
5-Very effective | 0.6 | 0.5–0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5–0.9 | ||
Snacking between meals (ref: not used) ¥ | < 0.0001 | 0.04 | ||||
5-Very effective | 1.9 | 1.5–2.5 | 1.4 | 1.1–1.9 | ||