Skip to main content

Table 1 The suggested GHQ-12's factor structures by the previous studies

From: How different domains of quality of life are associated with latent dimensions of mental health measured by GHQ-12

Studies

Study population

Age range

Applied model

Estimation methods

The best identified model

Gnambs [14]

A representative sample from the population of the United Kingdom or one of its countries

13–100 years

SEM

ML, WLS

Unidimensional factor with adjusting wording effects

Hankins [15]

General population of the UK

Not reported

SEM

ML

Unidimensional factor with adjusting wording effects

Motamed [16]

Adult population of Northern Iran

 >  = 18 years

CFA

Not reported

Unidimensional factor with correlated errors on negative items

Rodrigo [17]

A representative sample of all employees living in Catalonia (Spain)

17–82 years

CFA

WLS

Unidimensional factor with adjusting wording effects

Smith [18]

A representative sample of the ageing population of the UK

 > 50 years

CFA

ML

Unidimensional factor with adjusting negative wording effect

del Pilar Sánchez-López [19]

General Spanish population

25–65 years

EFA

ML

Three-factor structure, including successful coping, self-esteem, and stress

El-Metwally [20]

Al Kharj adult population of Saudi Arabia

 >  = 18 years

EFA

ML

Three-factor structure, including social dysfunction, anxiety, and loss of confidence

Griffith [21]

A representative UK sample

Mean = 45.8, SD = 18.0

Exploratory SEM

Bayesian estimation and ML

Four-factor structure, including lowered self-worth, social dysfunction, stress, and emotional coping

Mäkikangas [22]

Finnish working-age subjects

25–59 years

CFA

WLS

Three-factor structure, including anxiety/depression, social dysfunction, and loss of confidence

Montazeri [23]

A sample of young Iranian adolescents

18–25 years

EFA

ML

Two-factor structure, including psychological distress and social dysfunction

Najarkolaei [24]

Students of University of Tehran, Iran

18–39 years

EFA and CFA

ML and WLS

Two-factor structure, including social dysfunction and psychological distress

Namjoo [25]

Iranian elder people

 >  = 60 years

CFA

WLS

Two-factor structure, including social dysfunction and psychological distress

Salama-Younes [26]

Elderly French people

58–72 years

CFA

Not reported

Three-factor structure, including anxiety and depression, social dysfunction and loss of confidence

Gao [27]

A consecutive sample of outpatients with anxiety disorders and/or depressive disorders in Singapore

Not reported

CFA

ML

Three-factor structure, including anxiety and depression, social dysfunction and loss of confidence

Liang [28]

Young Chinese civil servants

20–45 years

EFA and CFA

ML

All one-, two-, and three-dimensional models were well fitted

Smith [49]

Cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses in the UK

Late middle age with mean = 57.42

IRT, CFA

ML

Unidimensional factor with correlated error terms

Abubakar [50]

A population of Kenyan adults and adolescents

12–60 years

CFA

Not reported

Three-factor structure, including anxiety, social dysfunction and loss of confidence

  1. SEM structural equation model, ML maximum likelihood, WLS weighted least square, CFA confirmatory factor analysis, EFA exploratory factor analysis, IRT item response theory