Skip to main content

Table 4 Diagonal reference models for the association between social mobility and poor self-rated oral health among participants in the 1970 British Cohort Study (n = 6524)

From: Intragenerational social mobility and self-rated oral health in the british cohort study

 

Model 4

ORa [95% CI]

Model 5

ORa [95% CI]

Model 6

ORa [95% CI]

Model 7

ORa [95% CI]

Weightsb

    

p: Origin

0.48 [0.33–0.63]

0.50 [0.35–0.64]

0.67 [0.44–0.91]

0.41 [0.19–0.62]

1-p: Destination

0.52 [0.37–0.67]

0.50 [0.36–0.65]

0.33 [0.09–0.56]

0.59 [0.38–0.81]

Diagonal intercepts (non-mobile individuals)c

  

μ11: I/II

0.61 [0.55–0.68]

0.60 [0.54–0.66]

0.60 [0.54–0.66]

0.61 [0.55–0.67]

μ22: III-NM/M

0.99 [0.89–1.11]

0.99 [0.89–1.11]

0.99 [0.90–1.11]

0.99 [0.89–1.12]

μ33: IV/V

1.65 [1.45–1.88]

1.68 [1.48–1.92]

1.67 [1.48–1.90]

1.67 [1.46–1.90]

Control variables

    

Gender (reference: male)

   

Female

0.58 [0.52–0.66]

0.59 [0.52–0.66]

0.59 [0.52–0.66]

0.59 [0.52–0.66]

Ethnicity (reference: white)

   

Non-White

1.06 [0.80–1.42]

1.06 [0.80–1.42]

1.06 [0.80–1.42]

1.06 [0.80–1.42]

Country (reference: England)

   

Scotland

1.08 [0.87–1.35]

1.08 [0.87–1.35]

1.08 [0.87–1.35]

1.08 [0.87–1.35]

Wales

1.08 [0.84–1.42]

1.08 [0.83–1.42]

1.08 [0.83–1.40]

1.08 [0.84–1.42]

Residence area (reference: urban)

   

Rural

0.86 [0.76–0.99]

0.87 [0.76–0.99]

0.87 [0.76–0.99]

0.86 [0.76–0.99]

Any mobility (reference: stable)

   

Mobile

 

0.90 [0.80–1.02]

  

Upward mobility (reference: no)

   

Yes

  

0.79 [0.63–0.99]

 

Downward mobility (reference: no)

   

Yes

   

0.90 [0.71–1.13]

Model fit statistics

    

AIC

6745.1

6744.5

6743.0

6746.2

BIC

6806.1

6812.3

6810.9

6814.0

  1. AIC: Akaike Information Criterion; BIC: Bayesian Information Criterion; CI: Confidence interval
  2. aDiagonal reference models were fitted with a logit link and odds ratios (ORs) were thus reported for all control variables. Model 4 did not include any indicator for social mobility (baseline for comparison); Model 5 included an indicator for any mobility (upward or downward); Model 5 included an indicator for upward mobility; and Model 6 included an indicator for downward mobility
  3. bWeights for social class of origin and destination are expressed as coefficients from 0 to 1
  4. cThese values are odds of reporting poor oral health among non-mobile adults at each social class