Assessment of the health utility of patients with leukemia in China

Zeng, Xueyun; Sui, Mingjie; Liu, Rui; Qian, Xinyu; Li, Wenfeng; Zheng, Erwei; Yang, Jinjin; Li, Jinmei; Huang, Weidong; Yang, Hongbin; Yu, Hongjuan; Luo, Nan

doi:10.1186/s12955-021-01711-1

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Table 2 Utility scores of EQ-5D-5L of respondents in different characteristics

From: Assessment of the health utility of patients with leukemia in China

	N = 186	Mean ± SD	Median(range)	95% CI	P values
Gender					0.248
Male	86 (46.2%)	0.751 ± 0.274	0.846 (− 0.222–1)	0.692–0.809
Female	100 (53.8%)	0.795 ± 0.246	0.882 (− 0.251–1)	0.746–0.844
Age (years, mean ± SD)	45.77 ± 14.30				0.584
≤ 37	60 (32.3%)	0.759 ± 0.289	0.848 (− 0.251–1)	0.685–0.834
> 37	126 (67.7%)	0.782 ± 0.245	0.882 (− 0.222–1)	0.738–0.825
Ethnicity					0.453
Han	179 (96.2%)	0.777 ± 0.260	0.882 (− 0.251–1)	0.739–0.815
Other	7 (3.8%)	0.702 ± 0.266	0.771 (0.329–1)	0.456–0.948
Religious belief					0.036*
No	164 (88.2%)	0.764 ± 0.267	0.848 (− 0.251–1)	0.723–0.805
Yes	22 (11.8%)	0.849 ± 0.187	0.893 (0.262–1)	0.767–0.932
Level of education					0.916
No more than primary school	31(16.7%)	0.757 ± 0.237	0.848 (-0.017–1)	0.670–0.843
Middle or high school	111 (59.7%)	0.779 ± 0.280	0.893 (− 0.251–1)	0.726–0.831
University	44 (23.7%)	0.776 ± 0.222	0.804 (0.083–1)	0.709–0.844
Marital status					0.731
Married	151 (81.2%)	0.778 ± 0.256	0.882 (− 0.251–1)	0.736–0.819
Other	35 (18.8%)	0.761 ± 0.277	0.848 (0.022–1)	0.668–0.856
Medical insurance					< 0.001**
No	16 (8.6%)	0.400 ± 0.454	0.345 (− 0.251–1)	0.158–0.642
Yes	170 (91.4%)	0.810 ± 0.202	0.882 (− 0.164–1)	0.779–0.840
Annual household income(CNY¥/USD $)					0.223
≤ 40,000 /5700	86 (46.2%)	0.741 ± 0.284	0.848 (− 0.251–1)	0.681–0.802
40,001/5700–79,999/11,400	91 (48.9%)	0.797 ± 0.242	0.893 (− 0.222–1)	0.747–0.848
≥ 80,000/11,000	9 (4.8%)	0.857 ± 0.132	0.894 (0.634–1)	0.755–0.959
Types of leukemia					0.066
ALL	18 (9.7%)	0.668 ± 0.3	0.748 (− 0.222–1)	0.519–0.817
AML	168 (90.3%)	0.786 ± 0.253	0.889 (− 0.251–1)	0.747–0.824
Duration since diagnosis	21.67 ± 20.16				0.857
≤ 12	84 (45.2%)	0.774 ± 0.275	0.893 (− 0.251–1)	0.715–0.834
13–24	45 (24.2%)	0.758 ± 0.280	0.882 (− 0.222–1)	0.674–0.842
≥ 24	57 (30.6%)	0.787 ± 0.220	0.831 (0.022–1)	0.729–0.845
Anxiety	10.97 ± 2.29				0.236
Normal	11 (5.9%)	0.923 ± 0.087	0.951 3333333433 (0.738–1)	0.865–0.982
Mild	72 (38.7%)	0.776 ± 0.307	0.902 (− 0.251–1)	0.704–0.849
Moderate	90 (48.4%)	0.761 ± 0.225	0.804 (− 0.160–1)	0.713–0.808
Severe	13 (7%)	0.731 ± 0.272	0.699 (0.312–1)	0.567–0.896
Depression	7.9 ± 2.21				0.979
Normal	83 (44.6%)	0.779 ± 0.262	0.841 (− 0.251–1)	0.721–0.836
Mild	81 (43.5%)	0.770 ± 0.262	0.885 (− 0.222–1)	0.712–0.828
Moderate	22 (11.8%)	0.773 ± 0.253	0.871 (0.083–1)	0.662–0.886
Social support	37.21 ± 7.97				< 0.001**
Low	8 (4.3%)	0.623 ± 0.108	0.632 (0.493–1)	0.533–0.713
Moderate	133 (71.5%)	0.735 ± 0.276	0.824 (− 0.251–1)	0.688–0.783
High	45 (24.2%)	0.917 ± 0.155	1.0 (0.262–1)	0.870–0.963
Family function (APGAR score) (Mean ± SD)	6.86 ± 1.81				< 0.001**
Severely dysfunctional (n, %)	47 (25.3%)	0.698 ± 0.246	0.734 (− 0.164–1)	0.848–0.937
Moderate dysfunctional (n, %)	89 (47.8%)	0.749 ± 0.291	0.848 (− 0.251–1)	0.687–0.810
Highly functional (n, %)	50 (26.9%)	0.892 ± 0.156	0.947 (0.262–1)	0.625–0.770
ECOG score					< 0.001**
0	43 (23.1%)	0.939 ± 0.133	1.0 (0.475–1)	0.898–0.979
1	97 (52.2%)	0.794 ± 0.203	0.893 (0.083–1)	0.753–0.835
2	34 (18.3%)	0.643 ± 0.237	0.725 (− 0.017–1)	0.560–0.725
3	12 (6.5%)	0.403 ± 0.475	0.520 (− 0.251–1)	0.102–0.705
Comorbidities					< 0.001**
No	136 (73.1%)	0.836 ± 0.184	0.893 (0.022–1)	0.805–0.868
Yes	50 (26.9%)	0.606 ± 0.348	0.585 (− 0.251–1)	0.506–0.705

^*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, respectively
CNY¥ represents Chinese Yuan; USD $ represents US dollar

Back to article page

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com