Skip to main content

Table 3 Redistribution pattern of response from 3 L to 5 L

From: Comparing the EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-5D-5 L: studying measurement and scores in Indonesian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Dimension

3 L

5 L

N (%) by 3 L level

Inconsistencies* N (%)

Mobility

1

1

94

(73.08)

11 (5.5)

 

2

19

(26.92)

2

2

29

(44.74)

 

3

23

(23.68)

 

4

22

(31.58)

Self-Care

1

1

150

(93.75)

8 (4.0)

 

2

10

(6.25)

2

2

15

(53.57)

 

3

8

(28.57)

 

4

5

(17.86)

3

4

1

(50.00)

 

5

1

(50.00)

Usual Activities

1

1

117

(89.31)

11 (5.5)

 

2

14

(10.69)

2

2

22

(45.84)

 

3

13

(27.08)

 

4

13

(27.08)

3

4

1

(12.50)

 

5

7

(87.50)

Pain/Discomfort

1

1

34

(75.55)

15 (7.6)

 

2

11

(24.45)

2

2

68

(59.65)

 

3

28

(24.56)

 

4

18

(15.79)

3

4

15

(65.22)

 

5

8

(34.78)

Anxiety/Depression

1

1

80

(88.89)

15 (7.6)

 

2

10

(11.11)

2

2

56

(67.47)

 

3

17

(20.48)

 

4

10

(12.05)

3

4

6

(60.00)

 

5

4

(40.00)

  1. *A consistent response pair was defined as a 3 L response which is at most one level away from the 5 L response (e.g., a participant chose level 1 in 3 L and chose level 2 in 5 L). When the 5 L level was more than 1 level away from the 3 L level (e.g., a participant chose level 1 in 3 L and chose level 3 in 5), this was labelled inconsistent
Back to article page

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us