Skip to main content

Table 2 Care content-specific agreement of study subjects according to the level of care coordination

From: Association between perception of care coordination and health outcomes in Korean cancer survivors

Care contents

Level of care coordination

P-for trend†

Overall (N = 1306)

Uncoordinated group (N = 167)

Intermediate group (N = 494)

Coordinated group (N = 645)

Whole person care (1–5)a

 Physical care

3.6 ± 1.1

3.0 ± 1.1

3.3 ± 1.0

4.0 ± 1.0

< 0.001

 Psychological care

3.2 ± 1.2

2.7 ± 1.2

2.9 ± 1.0

3.6 ± 1.2

< 0.001

 Social care

2.3 ± 1.3

1.8 ± 1.2

2.0 ± 1.0

2.6 ± 1.4

< 0.001

 Spiritual care

2.2 ± 1.3

1.8 ± 1.2

1.9 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 1.4

< 0.001

 Communication within medical team (3–15)a

14.2 ± 1.6

13.4 ± 2.3

14.1 ± 1.4

14.4 ± 1.5

< 0.001

Tailored patient education contents, yes

 Diet

64.1

52.1

59.6

70.7

< 0.001

 Weight control

58.4

45.5

55.7

63.8

< 0.001

 Physical activity

58.1

48.5

55.7

62.5

0.021

 Alcohol intake

27.4

20.5

22.6

33.1

0.014

 Smoking

26.1

20.5

20.7

31.7

0.017

  1. Data were presented as mean value ± standard deviation or percentage
  2. a Range of score. Higher score means higher level of agreement
  3. P values for trend were obtained by linear regression analysis for continuous variables and Mantel-Haenzel chi-square test for categorical variables