Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of DASS score between patients with good and poor TTR

From: Time in therapeutic range, quality of life and treatment satisfaction of patients on long-term warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study

DASS parameters

Total score, Mean ± SD;

95% CI

Without adjustment

Adjusted for duration*

Adjusted for education*

Good TTF

Poor TTF

p value

Good TTF

Poor TTF

p value

Good TTF

Poor TTF

p value

Mean ± SD;

95% CI

Mean ± SD;

95% CI

Mean ± SE;

95% CI

Mean ± SE;

95% CI

Mean ± SE;

95% CI

Mean ± SE;

95% CI

Total

55.2 ± 21.3;

52.6–57.6

54.6 ± 21.9;

49.5–59.7

55.4 ± 21.2;

52.6–58.1

0.779

55.0 ± 2.5;

50.0–59.9

55.2 ± 1.4;

52.5–58.0

0.922

53.9 ± 2.5;

48.9–58.9

55.6 ± 1.4;

52.8–58.4

0.563

L

18.0 ± 10.0;

16.9–19.1

18.4 ± 10.5;

15.9–20.8

17.9 ± 9.8;

16.6–19.1

0.699

18.5 ± 1.2;

16.2–20.8

17.8 ± 0.7;

16.5–19.1

0.998

17.8 ± 1.2;

15.5–20.1

18.0 ± 0.7;

16.7–19.3

0.864

H&B

15.6 ± 9.1;

14.5–16.6

14.9 ± 8.4;

13.0–16.9

15.8 ± 9.4;

14.5–17.0

0.502

15.1 ± 1.1;

13.0 -17.3

15.7 ± 0.6;

14.5–16.9

0.655

14.8 ± 1.1;

12.6–16.9

15.8 ± 0.6;

14.6–17.0

0.419

PPI

21.6 ± 5.9;

21.0–22.3

21.3 ± 6.3;

19.8–22.7

21.8 ± 5.8;

21.0–22.5

0.531

21.3 ± 0.7;

19.9–22.7

21.7 ± 0.4;

21.0–22.5

0.612

21.3 ± 0.7;

19.9–22.7

21.7 ± 0.4;

21.0–22.5

0.589

  1. DASS Duke Anticoagulant Satisfaction Scale, SD standard deviation, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, L limitations, H&B hassles and burdens, PPI positive psychological impacts
  2. *Adjusted with ANCOVA test