Skip to main content

Table 2 Test-retest reliability and ceiling/floor effects of the VISA-PC

From: The adaptation of sport assessment-patella questionnaire into simplified Chinese version: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity

 

1st-Test (mean ± SD)

2nd-Test (mean ± SD)

ICC (95%CI)

Observed range

Floor effect (%)a

Ceiling effect (%)a

Healthy Group

95.84 ± 5.97 b

95.81 ± 5.74

0.994 (0.960–0.998)

78–100

0.00

9.09

At-risk Group

91.87 ± 9.03 b

91.68 ± 8.99

0.992 (0.982–0.999)

68–99

0.00

0.00

Pathological Group

62.49 ± 11.39

62.41 ± 11.12

0.999 (0.998–0.999)

44–88

0.00

0.00

Total

83.95 ± 17.06

83.83 ± 16.96

0.999 (0.998–0.999)

44–100

0.00

2.34

  1. The 1st-Test was conducted at the beginning of this research (112 patients), the 2nd-Test was conducted one week later to calculate the test-retest reliability (ICC) of the VISA-PC (112 patients)
  2. ICC intra-class correlation coefficient, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, VISA-PC Chinese version of Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patellar Tendinosis questionnaire
  3. a Percentage of patients with the worst (floor effect) and the best (ceiling effect) condition
  4. b Significant difference compared to Pathological Group