Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of included studies

From: Quality of life in people with transsexuality after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Total score

Item 1

Item 2

Item 3

Item 4

Item 5

Item 6

Item 7

Item 8

Item 9

Item 10

Gorin-Lazard, A. et al. [44]

7

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

NA

Y

NA

NA

Vasegh Rahimparvar, F. et al. [17]

6

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

UC

UC

Y

Y

NA

Newfield, E. et al. [16]

7

NA

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

NA

Y

N

Motmans, J. et al. [15]

6

NA

UC

Y

Y

Y

Y

UC

Y

Y

NA

Wierckx, K. et al. [24]

6

Y

UC

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

N

Thompson, HM. et al. [45]

7

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

NA

Y

Y

Y

NA

George, A. et al. [43]

6

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

NA

UC

BaÅŸar, K. et al. [42]

6

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

NA

UC

Y

N

UC

  1. Item 1: Was the sample representative of the target population?
  2. Item 2: Were study participants recruited an appropriate way?
  3. Item 3: Was the sample size adequate?
  4. Item 4: Where the study subjects and setting described in detail?
  5. Item 5: Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
  6. Item 6: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
  7. Item 7: Was the condition measured reliably?
  8. Item 8: Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
  9. Item 9: Are all important confounding factors/subgroups/different identified and accounted for?
  10. Item 10: Were subpopulations identified using objective criteria?
  11. Y Yes, N No, UC Unclear, NA Not applicable
Back to article page

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

ISSN: 1477-7525

Contact us