Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between communication patterns and burnout: single-item analysis

From: Investigating the association between physicians self-efficacy regarding communication skills and risk of “burnout”

Variables

All physicians (n = 211)

N (%)

Physicians with burnout (n = 124)

N (%)

OR

95% CI

P value

Factors associated with high risk of burnout

 Breaking bad news means discussing a poor prognosis

  Yes

136 (64%)

86 (69%)

1.94

1.03–3.64

0.039

  No

75 (36%)

38 (31%)

 Breaking bad news is stressful

  Yes

78 (37%)

57 (46%)

2.92

1.49–5.73

0.001

  No

133 (63%)

67 (54%)

 Discussing prognosis is talking about the success of treatment options

  Yes

75 (36%)

52 (42%)

2.12

1.05–4.28

0.036

  No

136 (64%)

72 (58%)

 Self-evaluating as unskilled at patient-physician communication

  Yes

44 (22%)

31 (27%)

2.27

1.04–4.75

0.029

  No

156 (78%)

85 (73%)

 Professional Role

  Resident

93 (46%)

60 (51%)

1.75

1.00–3.04

0.049

  Consultant

109 (54%)

57 (49%)

Factors associated with low risk of burnout

 Having a consistent plan for communication

  Yes

80 (38%)

40 (32%)

0.37

0.14–0.96

0.040

  No

130 (62%)

84 (68%)

 Breaking bad news only considered as emotionally engaging

  Yes

158 (75%)

89 (72%)

0.56

0.31–0.98

0.042

  No

53 (25%)

35 (28%)

 Addressing patients’ emotions with empathic responses

  Yes

137 (66%)

71 (58%)

0.39

0.18–0.85

0.017

  No

72 (34%)

51 (42%)

 Discussing prognosis with the goal of promoting awareness of illness trajectory, therapeutic choices and to optimize patients’ adjustment

  Yes

119 (69%)

65 (63%)

0.44

0.24–0.82

0.010

  No

53 (31%)

38 (37%)

 Sharing decisions with patients

  Yes

86 (41%)

42 (34%)

0.46

0.24–0.88

0.019

  No

125 (59%)

82 (66%)

 Mastering communication skills by using textbooks and scientific literature

  Yes

13 (6%)

3 (2%)

0.18

0.01–0.68

0.011

  No

198 (94%)

121 (98%)

 Self-evaluating communication skills as good or very good

  Yes

74 (35%)

30 (24%)

0.31

0.17–0.56

0.000

  No

136 (75%)

93 (76%)

 Years from graduation

  6–16

60 (52%)

29 (23%a)

0.29

0.13–0.67

0.003

  0–3

55 (48%)

37 (30%a)

  1. aThe sum of these fractions is < 1 as the two compared covariates represent only a part of the whole responders cohort
  2. Shown are only statistically significant associations. Percentages are calculated as fractions of responders to each item
  3. Abbreviations: OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval