Skip to main content

Table 3 Factor affecting EQ-5D utility score and EQ-VAS score difference

From: The effect of oral sildenafil therapy on health-related quality of life in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension related to uncorrected secundum atrial septal defect: a quasi experimental study

Variable

Utility Score Difference

P

EQ-VAS Score Difference

P

Gender

 Male, n = 3

0.011 ± 0.018

0.083

11.67 ± 7.64

0.242

 Female, n = 15

0.001 ± 0.109

16.67 ± 5.77

Age

 < 38 y.o, n = 9

0.089 ± 0.114

0.656

4.44 ± 9.17

0.119

 ≥ 38 y.o, n = 9

0.122 ± 0.210

10 ± 7.50

Education status

 Low, n = 2

0.254 ± 0.530

1.000

15 ± 7.10

0.166

 High, n = 16

0.062 ± 0.042

6.25 ± 8.47

Marital Status

 Married, n = 15

0.052 ± 0.034

0.339

13.33 ± 11.55

0.460

 Not Married, n = 3

0.185 ± 0.160

5 ± 13.23

Occupation

 Employed, n = 5

0.027 ± 0.045

0.091

9 ± 7.42

0.443

 Unemployed, n = 13

0.494 ± 0.460

4 ± 8.9

Other treatment

 With treatment, n = 8

0.192 ± 0.208

0.089

5 ± 9.64

0.249

 No treatment, n = 10

0.051 ± 0.050

8.13 ± 8.43

Comorbid disease

 With comorbid disease, n = 2

0.099 ± 0.140

0.944

2.5 ± 3.54

0.511

 Without comorbid disease, n = 16

0.106 ± 0.171

10 ± 14.14

  1. Description: Mann Whitney test analysis results showed p value> 0.05 in all sub groups. This means that there is no statistically significant difference between the factors affecting HRQoL to the difference of EQ-5D utility score and EQ-VAS score, * p < 0.05