Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of measures of fit values of three-factor and four-factor models using CFA

From: The development, validation, and psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) for school-age children

Model

χ2

DF

P

χ2/DF

RMSEA

GFI

AGFI

CFI

AIC

Three-factor

353.88

147

< 0.001

2.41*

0.06*

0.91*

0.88*

0.86

439.88

Four-factor

346.50

145

< 0.001

2.39*

0.06*

0.91*

0.89*

0.86

436.50*

  1. Note: RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, GFI Goodness-of-Fit Index, AGFI Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit-Index, CFI Comparative Fit Index, AIC Akaike Information Criterion; Values for acceptable fit: χ2/DF ≤ 3, RMSEA ≤0.08, 0.90 ≤ GFI, 0.85 ≤ AGFI, 0.95 ≤ FI, AIC: smaller than AIC for comparison model [34]. * Satisfied acceptable fit criteria value