Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression for the association between adolescents’ social and clinical characteristics and OIDP, according to ethnic belongingness (cluster adjusted). Odds ratios (OR) ad 95% confidence interval (CI)

From: Oral impacts on daily performances and its socio-demographic and clinical distribution: a cross-sectional study of adolescents living in Maasai population areas, Tanzania

Variable Maasai Non-Maasai
Step 1 OR (95% CI) Step 2 OR (95% CI) Step 1 OR (95% CI) Step 2 OR (95% CI)
District of residence
 Monduli 1 1 1 1
 Longido 0.2 (0.1–0.4)b 0.4 (0.2–0.7)b 0.7 (0.3–1.7) 0.8 (0.3–2.5)
Age
 12–14 years 1 1 1 1
 15–17 years 1.1 (0.6–2.0) 0.9 (0.5–1.7) 3.1 (1.0–9.1) 3.7 (1.1–12.8)b
Wealth index
 Poorest 1 1 1 1
 Least poor 2.0 (1.3–3.0)b 1.9 (1.2–2.9)b 1.4 (0.4–4.5) 1.7 (0.5–6.3)
Oral hygiene status
 Poor   1   1
 Good   0.6 (0.3–1.0)   0.6 (0.3–1.5)
DMFT
 DMFT = 0   1   1
 DMFT > 0   2.8 (1.4–5.5)b   3.3 (1.2–9.0)b
Dental fluorosis
 TF 0–4   1   1
 TF 5–9   1.7 (1.0–2.9)   1.0 (0.4–2.7)
TMD pain
 2Q/TMDa = 0   1   1
 2Q/TMD > 0   3.0 (1.7–5.2)b   9.0 (3.3–25.0)b
  1. a2Q/TMD Two epidemiological questions regarding TMD pain
  2. bStatistically significant