Skip to main content

Table 3 Distribution of the Strength of Recommendation and Level of Evidence among TCM Guidelines

From: A critical review to grading systems and recommendations of traditional Chinese medicine guidelines

Subgroups

No of recommendations

Strength of Recommendation, No. (%)

Level of Evidence, No. (%)

 

I

II

UG

A

B

C

D

Year of publication

 2003–2007

82

11 (13.4)

45 (54.9)

26 (31.7)

9 (11.0)

30 (36.6)

21 (25.6)

22 (26.8)

 2008–2012

984

68 (6.9)

776 (78.9)

140 (14.2)

101 (10.3)

228 (23.2)

341 (34.7)

314 (31.9)

 2013–2016

100

5 (5.0)

78 (78.0)

17 (17.0)

11 (11.0)

25 (25.0)

41 (41.0)

23 (23.0)

 2017–2018

118

16 (13.6)

79 (66.9)

23 (19.5)

21 (17.8)

42 (35.6)

26 (22.0)

29 (24.6)

 Total

1284

100 (7.8)

978 (76.2)

206 (16.0)

142 (11.1)

325 (25.3)

429 (33.4)

388 (30.2)

Type of recommendation

 Treatment

905

73 (8.0)

678 (75.0)

154 (17.0)

97 (10.7)

224 (24.8)

267 (29.5)

317 (35.0)

 Diagnosis

389

28 (7.2)

309 (79.4)

52 (13.4)

45 (11.6)

101 (26.0)

162 (41.6)

81 (20.8)

 Total

1284

100 (7.8)

978 (76.2)

206 (16.0)

142 (11.1)

325 (25.3)

429 (33.4)

388 (30.2)

Type of publication

 CSCD indexed journal

364

28 (7.7)

280 (77.1)

55 (15.2)

43 (11.8)

85 (23.1)

117 (32.2)

119 (32.8)

 Non-CSCD indexed journal

680

62 (9.1)

511 (75.1)

107 (15.7)

76 (11.2)

175 (25.7)

221 (32.5)

208 (30.6)

 Book

250

10 (4.0)

196 (78.4)

44 (17.6)

23 (9.2)

66 (26.4)

91 (36.4)

70 (28.0)

 Total

1284

100 (7.8)

978 (76.2)

206 (16.0)

142 (11.1)

325 (25.3)

429 (33.4)

388 (30.2)

Source of funding

 Any funding

924

74 (7.9)

675 (73.1)

175 (19.0)

105 (11.4)

257 (27.8)

334 (36.2)

228 (24.6)

 Not reported

370

27 (7.3)

312 (84.3)

31 (8.4)

37 (10.0)

68 (18.4)

95 (25.7)

170 (45.9)

 Total

1284

100 (7.8)

978 (76.2)

206 (16.0)

142 (11.1)

325 (25.3)

429 (33.4)

388 (30.2)