Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear mixed models of Despair, Impaired Ambulation, and Impaired Performance

From: Quality of life analysis of patients treated with cetuximab or cisplatin for locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck in the United States

 

Despaira

Impaired Ambulationb

Impaired Performancec

Effect

Estimate (SE)

P-value

Estimate (SE)

P-value

Estimate (SE)

P-value

Intercept

61.22 (9.271)

< 0.0001

52.86 (8.981)

< 0.0001

41.96 (9.271)

0.0001

Time (months) since diagnosis

− 0.15 (0.048)

0.003

− 0.03 (0.026)

0.256

− 0.04 (0.037)

0.241

Treatment: cetuximab±RT (vs. cisplatin±RT)

6.62 (2.010)

0.001

−0.82 (1.570)

0.602

−0.13 (1.703)

0.941

Treatment* time since diagnosis

−0.21 (0.141)

0.129

0.08 (0.092)

0.390

−0.01 (0.140)

0.930

Age at diagnosis

−0.27 (0.084)

0.001

−0.08 (0.065)

0.249

−0.05 (0.067)

0.477

Male (vs. female)

−1.32 (1.702)

0.438

− 1.63 (1.204)

0.175

−0.45 (1.227)

0.713

White (vs. minority/unknown)

2.91 (1.513)

0.055

−0.40 (1.114)

0.720

1.62 (1.133)

0.152

Impaired composite performance status (vs. not impaired)

−0.62 (2.846)

0.829

3.34 (2.146)

0.120

2.30 (2.193)

0.294

Weighted index of comorbid conditions

0.35 (0.875)

0.689

1.33 (0.570)

0.020

0.77 (0.583)

0.189

Smoking status: current or past (vs. never/unknown/undocumented)

1.90 (1.910)

0.321

1.67 (1.398)

0.231

2.36 (1.429)

0.100

Alcohol status

0.424

0.307

0.357

 Current or past abuse (vs. never/unknown/undocumented)

−0.82 (1.984)

0.679

1.01 (1.460)

0.490

0.66 (1.491)

0.660

 Current or past use (vs. never/unknown/undocumented)

−2.09 (1.633)

0.201

−0.91 (1.184)

0.445

−1.08 (1.209)

0.370

Stage at start: Stage III (vs. Stage IV)

0.53 (1.377)

0.698

−0.60 (1.058)

0.571

−0.02 (1.076)

0.989

Oral (vs. non-oral)

−4.92 (3.910)

0.209

−0.84 (2.822)

0.766

−0.48 (2.892)

0.869

Pharynx (vs. non-pharynx)

−5.00 (3.557)

0.161

−0.61 (2.788)

0.826

−0.92 (2.851)

0.746

Larynx (vs. non-larynx)

−4.30 (3.702)

0.246

−3.84 (2.959)

0.195

−3.27 (3.022)

0.279

HPV test results (positive vs. non-positive)

−6.18 (4.057)

0.128

0.715 (3.091)

0.817

0.62 (3.177)

0.845

P16 test results (positive vs. non-positive)

0.69 (1.976)

0.728

1.528 (1.194)

0.201

1.46 (1.218)

0.231

Feeding tube placement (vs. not placed)

0.060 (1.451)

0.967

0.54 (1.076)

0.613

1.20 (1.097)

0.273

BMI

0.055 (0.109)

0.612

0.08 (0.086)

0.376

0.12 (0.087)

0.155

Insurance

0.014

0.008

0.001

 Only public (vs. only private)

4.57 (1.956)

0.020

4.65 (1.424)

0.001

5.70 (1.452)

< 0.0001

 Both public and private (vs. only private)

5.53 (1.793)

0.002

3.20 (1.338)

0.017

3.77 (1.365)

0.006

 Other/unknown/undocumented (vs. only private)

1.72 (4.638)

0.711

3.66 (3.308)

0.268

5.54 (3.403)

0.104

US region South (vs. non-South)

3.20 (5.737)

0.577

1.69 (6.750)

0.802

−1.57 (7.014)

0.823

  1. Reference level for each comparison is in parentheses
  2. BMI body mass index, HPV human papilloma virus, RT radiation therapy, SE standard error, US United States
  3. aAnalysis is based on 163 patients and 1048 observations
  4. bAnalysis is based on 218 patients and 1320 observations
  5. cAnalysis is based on 218 patients and 1311 observations
  6. *refers to an interaction