Skip to main content

Table 5 Fit statistics during removal of misfit items from J-EAT-10 with scoring structure 01122

From: Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders

Scale analysis

% Extr.

Fit residuals mean (SD)

Item-trait interaction

Reliability

Individual item-fit

Item

Person

χ2 (df)

P

PSI / α

Power of fit

Misfit items

4.a. Remove item 6

42%

−1.58 (3.96)

−0.36 (0.95)

382.42 (36)

< 0.001

0.61 / 0.79

Reasonable

Item 1 / FR = 5.5a,b

Item 3 / FR = −4.3a,b

Item 4 / FR = −6.2a,b

Item 8 / FR = − 3.2a,b

Item 10 / FR = −6.4a,b

Item 2,5,7,9 a,b

4.b. Remove item 10

42%

−1.28 (3.53)

− 0.34 (0.93)

299.55 (24)

< 0.001

0.53 / 0.74

Reasonable

Item 1 / FR = 4.6a,b

Item 3 / FR = − 4.5a,b

Item 4 / FR = − 6.2a,b

Item 8 / FR = − 3.1a,b

Item 2,5,7,9a,b

4.c. Remove item 4

43%

−1.02 (2.85)

−0.33 (0.87)

230.68 (21)

< 0.001

0.40 / 0.66

Low

Item 1/ FR = 3.5a,b

Item 3 / FR = − 4.9a,b

Item 8 / FR = − 2.6a,b

Item 2,5,7 a,b

4.d. Remove item 3

43%

−0.69 (2.15)

− 0.32 (0.85)

196.29 (18)

< 0.001

0.24 / 0.55

Too low

Item 7 / FR = − 2.8 a,b

Item 8 / FR = − 2.6 a,b

Item 1,2,5 a,b

4.e. Remove item 7

45%

−0.39 (1.63)

− 0.28 (0.75)

163.76 (10)

< 0.001

0.02 / 0.38

Too low

Item 1,2,5,8 a,b

Optimal values <  15%

0 (<  1.00)

0 (<  1.00)

 

> 0.05

> 0.70

 

FR < ±2.5, or non-significant fit statistics

  1. In analyses 4.c. to 4.e, item 9 displayed satisfactory fit
  2. J-EAT-10 Japanese version of the Eating Assessment Tool, % Extr. percentage of extreme scores, SD standard deviation, χ2 Chi-square, df degrees of freedom, PSI Person Separation Index, α Cronbach’s alpha, CI confidence interval
  3. aSignificant χ2 (Bonferroni adjusted)
  4. bSignificant F statistics (Bonferroni adjusted)