Skip to main content

Table 5 Fit statistics during removal of misfit items from J-EAT-10 with scoring structure 01122

From: Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders

Scale analysis % Extr. Fit residuals mean (SD) Item-trait interaction Reliability Individual item-fit
Item Person χ2 (df) P PSI / α Power of fit Misfit items
4.a. Remove item 6 42% −1.58 (3.96) −0.36 (0.95) 382.42 (36) < 0.001 0.61 / 0.79 Reasonable Item 1 / FR = 5.5a,b
Item 3 / FR = −4.3a,b
Item 4 / FR = −6.2a,b
Item 8 / FR = − 3.2a,b
Item 10 / FR = −6.4a,b
Item 2,5,7,9 a,b
4.b. Remove item 10 42% −1.28 (3.53) − 0.34 (0.93) 299.55 (24) < 0.001 0.53 / 0.74 Reasonable Item 1 / FR = 4.6a,b
Item 3 / FR = − 4.5a,b
Item 4 / FR = − 6.2a,b
Item 8 / FR = − 3.1a,b
Item 2,5,7,9a,b
4.c. Remove item 4 43% −1.02 (2.85) −0.33 (0.87) 230.68 (21) < 0.001 0.40 / 0.66 Low Item 1/ FR = 3.5a,b
Item 3 / FR = − 4.9a,b
Item 8 / FR = − 2.6a,b
Item 2,5,7 a,b
4.d. Remove item 3 43% −0.69 (2.15) − 0.32 (0.85) 196.29 (18) < 0.001 0.24 / 0.55 Too low Item 7 / FR = − 2.8 a,b
Item 8 / FR = − 2.6 a,b
Item 1,2,5 a,b
4.e. Remove item 7 45% −0.39 (1.63) − 0.28 (0.75) 163.76 (10) < 0.001 0.02 / 0.38 Too low Item 1,2,5,8 a,b
Optimal values <  15% 0 (<  1.00) 0 (<  1.00)   > 0.05 > 0.70   FR < ±2.5, or non-significant fit statistics
  1. In analyses 4.c. to 4.e, item 9 displayed satisfactory fit
  2. J-EAT-10 Japanese version of the Eating Assessment Tool, % Extr. percentage of extreme scores, SD standard deviation, χ2 Chi-square, df degrees of freedom, PSI Person Separation Index, α Cronbach’s alpha, CI confidence interval
  3. aSignificant χ2 (Bonferroni adjusted)
  4. bSignificant F statistics (Bonferroni adjusted)