Skip to main content

Table 2 Distributions of responses to EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-5D-5 L items

From: Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-3 L and the EQ-5D-5 L in an elderly Chinese population

Dimension

EQ-5D-3 L

EQ-5D-5 L

Absolute difference in ceiling effects

Relative difference in ceiling effects

Level

n (%)

Level

n (%)

Mobility

1

240 (74.1)

1

238 (73.5)

0.6

0.8

2

84 (25.9)

2

74 (22.8)

  

3

0.0

3

9 (2.8)

  
  

4

0 (0)

  
  

5

3 (0.9)

  

Self-care

1

258 (79.6)

1

245 (75.6)

4.0

5.0

2

65 (20.1)

2

72 (22.2)

  

3

1 (0.3)

3

7 (2.2)

  
  

4

0 (0)

  
  

5

0 (0)

  

Usual activities

1

237 (73.1)

1

249 (76.9)

−3.8

−5.2

2

87 (26.9)

2

67 (20.7)

  

3

0 (0.0)

3

6 (1.9)

  
  

4

0 (0)

  
  

5

2 (0.6)

  

Pain/discomfort

1

182 (56.2)

1

216 (66.7)

−10.5

−18.7

2

142 (43.8)

2

103 (31.8)

  

3

0 (0.0)

3

5 (1.5)

  
  

4

0 (0)

  
  

5

0 (0)

  

Anxiety/depression

1

310 (95.7)

1

273 (84.3)

11.4

11.9

2

14 (4.0)

2

50 (15.4)

  

3

0 (0.0)

3

1 (0.3)

  
  

4

0 (0)

  
  

5

0 (0)

  

Full health (all dimensions considered)

 

170 (52.4)

 

134 (41.3)

11.1

21.2

  1. Note EQ-5D EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire
  2. * Relative reduction was defined as ([Ceiling3 L-Ceiling5 L]/Celing3 L) in ceiling effects from the EQ-5D-3 L to the EQ-5D-5 L.