Skip to main content

Table 1 A priori formulated hypotheses to evaluate construct validity

From: Psychometric properties of the psychosocial screening instrument for physical trauma patients (PSIT)

No.

Hypothesis

1

Strong and positive correlations (r ≥ 0.50) were expected between PSIT subscale 1 and the PHQ-9, STAI-S, IES-R, and a strong and negative correlation (r ≥ − 0.50) between PSIT subscale 1 and domain 2 of the WHOQOL-Bref.

2

Strong and positive correlations (r ≥ 0.50) were expected between PSIT subscale 2 and the STAI-S, IES-R, and the PHQ-9.

3

A moderate and negative correlation (r ≥ −0.30 but < −0.50) was expected between PSIT subscale 2 and domain 1 of the WHOQOL-Bref.

4

Strong and negative correlations (r ≥ −0.50) were expected between PSIT subscale 3 and the RSES and domains 2 and 3 of the WHOQOL-Bref.

5

A moderate and negative correlation (r ≥ −0.30 but < −0.50) was expected between PSIT subscale 3 and domain 1 of the WHOQOL-Bref.

  1. Abbreviations: No. Number, PSIT Psychosocial Screening Instrument for Trauma patients, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9, STAI-S State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State subscale, IES-R Impact of Events Scale-Revised, WHOQOL-Bref World Health Organization Quality of Life-Abbreviated Version, RSES Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale