Skip to main content

Table 2 The role of SEP in explaining ethnic inequalities in oral health outcomes

From: Socioeconomic inequalities in adult oral health across different ethnic groups in England

 

Prevalence

Model 1a

Model 2a

Model 3a

%

[95% CI]

ORb [95% CI]

ORb [95% CI]

ORb [95% CI]

Regression models for edentulousness (n = 45,599)

Ethnicity

 White British

11.6

[11.2–12.0]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

 Irish

12.1

[10.4–13.7]

1.05 [0.89–1.23]

1.25 [1.03–1.52]c

1.16 [0.94–1.41]

 Black Caribbean

11.0

[9.2–12.7]

0.94 [0.78–1.12]

1.72 [1.39–2.14]e

1.13 [0.90–1.42]

 Indian

3.9

[2.9–4.9]

0.31 [0.23–0.41]e

0.64 [0.47–0.87]d

0.55 [0.40–0.76]e

 Pakistani

2.6

[1.7–3.5]

0.21 [0.14–0.29]e

0.93 [0.63–1.37]

0.56 [0.38–0.83]d

 Bangladeshi

2.8

[1.8–3.8]

0.22 [0.15–0.32]e

0.80 [0.53–1.22]

0.35 [0.23–0.52]e

 Chinese

2.9

[1.6–4.2]

0.23 [0.14–0.36]e

0.53 [0.34–0.85]d

0.41 [0.25–0.66]e

SEP measure

 Q1 (wealthiest)

0.9

[0.7–1.2]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

 Q2

2.5

[2.1–2.9]

2.70 [1.95–3.75]e

1.79 [1.28–2.50]d

1.80 [1.29–2.51]d

 Q3

6.6

[5.9–7.3]

7.51 [5.54–10.16]e

3.72 [2.72–5.08]e

3.77 [2.76–5.14]e

 Q4

15.1

[14.2–16.1]

18.91 [14.13–25.32]e

5.78 [4.28–7.81]e

5.91 [4.37–8.00]e

 Q5 (poorest)

29.0

[27.9–30.2]

43.40 [32.55–57.88]e

11.81 [8.77–15.91]e

12.31 [9.12–16.63]e

Regression models for toothache (n = 40,737)

Ethnicity

 White British

20.9

[20.3–21.5]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

 Irish

24.8

[22.5–27.2]

1.25 [1.10–1.42]d

1.21 [1.06–1.38]d

1.22 [1.06–1.39]d

 Black Caribbean

29.6

[26.9–32.2]

1.59 [1.39–1.81]e

1.43 [1.25–1.65]e

1.37 [1.19–1.58]e

 Indian

24.9

[22.5–27.4]

1.26 [1.10–1.44]d

1.15 [1.00–1.32]c

1.13 [0.98–1.30]

 Pakistani

26.3

[23.7–28.9]

1.35 [1.18–1.55]e

1.16 [1.01–1.35]c

1.09 [0.93–1.26]

 Bangladeshi

22.5

[19.6–25.4]

1.10 [0.93–1.30]

0.93 [0.78–1.11]

0.83 [0.69–0.99]c

 Chinese

20.6

[17.3–23.9]

0.98 [0.80–1.20]

0.87 [0.71–1.08]

0.86 [0.69–1.06]

SEP measure

 Q1 (wealthiest)

20.8

[19.7–21.9]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

1.00 [Reference]

 Q2

20.5

[19.4–21.5]

0.99 [0.90–1.09]

0.99 [0.90–1.10]

0.99 [0.90–1.10]

 Q3

21.9

[20.9–23.0]

1.05 [0.95–1.15]

1.06 [0.96–1.17]

1.06 [0.96–1.17]

 Q4

21.6

[20.5–22.8]

1.05 [0.95–1.16]

1.10 [0.99–1.21]

1.10 [0.99–1.21]

 Q5 (poorest)

24.3

[23.0–25.5]

1.21 [1.10–1.33]e

1.26 [1.15–1.39]e

1.27 [1.15–1.40]e

  1. a Model 1 reports the unadjusted associations of ethnicity and the composite measure of SEP with each oral health outcome. Model 2 included ethnicity (or the composite measure of SEP), sex, continuous age and dummy variables for survey years as explanatory variables. Model 3 included both ethnicity and the composite measure of SEP (mutually adjusted) as well as sex, continuous age and dummy variables for survey years as explanatory variables
  2. b Logistic regression was fitted and odds ratios (OR) reported
  3. cp < 0.05; dp < 0.01, ep < 0.001