Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 851) and mean, standard deviation and range of the flourishing score

From: Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia

Characteristics

Mean (SD) or N (%)

Flourishing score

Mean (SD)

Range

Statistics

Age

75.36 (6.94)

  

β =  − 0.11∗

 Female

76.16 (6.85)

  

β =  − 0.13∗

 Male

74.16 (6.90)

  

β =  − 0.09

Sex

 Female

510 (59.93)

41.07 (6.83)

17–56

χ2(1) = 0.64

 Male

341 (40.07)

40.68 (7.40)

21–56

Marital status

 Divorced

66 (7.76)

41.32 (7.21)

27–54

χ2(3) = 9.28∗

 Married/Partner

335 (39.37)

41.56 (7.48)

21–56

 Single

17 (2.00)

37.88 (6.91)

25–52

 Widowed

433 (50.88)

40.47 (6.66)

17–56

Education

 High (university)

503 (59.11)

42.04 (6.58)

21–56

χ2(1) = 31.87∗

 Low (less than university)

348 (40.89)

39.28 (7.42)

17–56

Health

 Very bad (1)

68 (7.99)

35.50 (7.04)

24–51

χ2(4) = 107.01∗

 Bad (2)

270 (31.73)

38.81 (6.75)

17–55

 Fair (3)

456 (53.58)

42.36 (6.48)

19–56

 Good (4)

54 (6.35)

46.04 (6.16)

32–56

 Very good (5)

3 (0.35)

40.67 (8.33)

34–50

Satisfied Living Standard

 Satisfied

380 (44.65)

42.31 (6.94)

17–56

χ2(1) = 24.87∗

 Dissatisfied

471 (55.35)

39.79 (6.97)

21–55

Living arrangement

 Living alone

337 (39.60)

40.39 (6.59)

19–56

χ2(2) = 6.68∗

 Living with relatives

507 (59.58)

41.31 (7.35)

17–56

 Living with non-relatives

7 (0.82)

37.43 (6.16)

29–47

  1. The relationship between flourishing score and age was measured with a linear model (flourishing score as outcome and age as predictor), for the overall sample and for the two sexes separately. The relationship between FS and the categorical variables was examined using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. * p < 0.05