The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke

Table 4 Utility differences due to dependency, flexibility and tenacity

	mRS > 0 vs. mRS = 0	Dependent vs. independent	Low vs. medium flexibility	Medium vs. high flexibility	Low vs. medium tenacity	Medium vs. high tenacity
mRS 0	ref	−0.044	−0.027	−0.018	−0.002	−0.002
mRS 1	−0.0677	−0.060	−0.036	−0.025	−0.003	−0.003
mRS 2	−0.1679	−0.083	−0.051	−0.034	−0.004	−0.004
mRS 3	−0.3015	−0.115	−0.070	−0.047	−0.005	− 0.005
mRS 4	−0.4500	− 0.150	−0.091	− 0.062	−0.006	− 0.007
mRS 5	−0.5498	− 0.173	−0.105	− 0.071	−0.007	− 0.008
Average Effect	−0.307	− 0.104	−0.063	− 0.043	−0.004	− 0.005
Note	With 41% patients dependent, TGP = 31.3 FGA = 35.3	With TGP = 31.3 and FGA = 35.3	With 41% of patients dependent and TGP = 31.3		With 41% of patients dependent and FGA = 35.3

ISSN: 1477-7525