Skip to main content

Table 4 Utility differences due to dependency, flexibility and tenacity

From: The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke

  mRS > 0 vs. mRS = 0 Dependent vs. independent Low vs. medium flexibility Medium vs. high flexibility Low vs. medium tenacity Medium vs. high tenacity
mRS 0 ref −0.044 −0.027 −0.018 −0.002 −0.002
mRS 1 −0.0677 −0.060 −0.036 −0.025 −0.003 −0.003
mRS 2 −0.1679 −0.083 −0.051 −0.034 −0.004 −0.004
mRS 3 −0.3015 −0.115 −0.070 −0.047 −0.005 − 0.005
mRS 4 −0.4500 − 0.150 −0.091 − 0.062 −0.006 − 0.007
mRS 5 −0.5498 − 0.173 −0.105 − 0.071 −0.007 − 0.008
Average Effect −0.307 − 0.104 −0.063 − 0.043 −0.004 − 0.005
Note With 41% patients dependent, TGP = 31.3 FGA = 35.3 With TGP = 31.3 and FGA = 35.3 With 41% of patients dependent and TGP = 31.3 With 41% of patients dependent and FGA = 35.3