Skip to main content

Table 1 An overview of studies that have performed a factor analyses on Herth Hope Index

From: Rasch analysis of the Herth Hope Index in cancer patients

Authors & Year

Sample (Country)

HHI Mean (SD)

Cronbach’s alpha

Test-retest reliability

Factor analysis

Criterion/convergent validity

Discriminant validity

Herth 1992

172 adults acute, chronic and terminally ill (US)

0.97

0.91

3 factors (MLFA)

(61% variance)

Factor 1: 1,2,6,11

Factor 2: 4,7,10,12

Factor 3: 3,5,8,9

Herth Hope Scale r = 0.92

Existential Well-being Scale r = 0.84

Nowotny Hope Scale r = 0.81

Hopelessness Scale r = −0.73

Benzein & Berg 2003

85 adults, 40 patients in palliative care & 45 family caregivers (Sweden)

0.88

2 factors (PCA)

(56% variance)

Factor 1: 1–3,6–12

Factor 2: 4,5

Miller Hope Scale r = 0.82

Hopelessness r = −0.69

Wahl et al. 2004

1893 - general population (Norway)

36.7 (4.2)

0.81

2 factors (MLFA)

(38% variance)

Factor 1: 1,2,4,5,7–12

Factor 2: 3,6

Quality of Life r = 0.48

Fatigue severity r = −0.30

Phillips –Salimi et al. 2007

Adolescents/children with cancer, 127 in treatment, 74 newly diagnosed (US)

0.84 in treatment, 0.78 newly diagnosed

1 factor (CFA)

Self-esteem r = 0.62

Self-confidence r = 0.57

Self-transcendence r = 0.58

Quality of life r = 0.33

Uncertainty in illness r = −0.36

Symptom dis-tress r = − 0.22

Van Gestel-Timmermans et al. 2010

341 severe mental illness (Netherlands)

0.84

0.79

2 factors (PCA)

(47% variance)

Factor 1: 1–3,6,10,12

Factor 2: 4,5,7-9,11

Self-efficacy r = 0.72

Quality of Life r = 0.56

Mental health r = 0.59

Loneliness r = −0.47

Chan et al. 2011

120 patients with heart failure (China)

0.89

0.86

3 factors (CFA)

Factor 1:1,2,6,11

Factor 2: 4,7,10,12

Factor 3: 3,5,8,9

Self-esteem r = 0.40

Depression r = −0.40

Ripamonti et al. 2012

266 patients with non-advanced cancer (Italy)

0.84

0.64

1 factor (CFA)

Spiritual Well-being r = 0.69,

Anxiety-Depression r = −0.51, Fatigue r = − 0.30

Haugan et al. 2013

202 cognitively intact nursing home patients (Norway)

35.1 (4.2)

0.76

2 factors (CFA)

11 items (exclude #6)

(42% variance)

Factor 1: 1–5,10–12

Factor 2: 7–9

Self-transcendence r = 0.59

Purpose in life r = 0.65

Spiritual well-being r = 0.72

Depression r = −0.22

Hunsaker et al. 2016

51 family members and 45 cognitive impaired patients (US)

38.8 (5.2) for family, 39.7 (5.2) for patients

0.85

2 factors (EFA)

(51% variance)

Factor 1: 2,3,7,9,10,12

Factor 2: 1,4-6,8,11

Satisfaction with social support r = 0.37

Depression r = −.21

  1. Abbreviations: CFA confirmatory factor analysis, EFA exploratory factor analysis, HHI Herth Hope Index, MLFA multilevel factor analysis, PCA principal components analysis