Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review

Author (Year) (Reference)

Country

Study design

Sample size (PSC cases)

Mean age (SD) year

Gender (Male n %)

Disease stage

Mayo risk score / MELD Score

IBD (Yes/No (n (%))

LT (Yes/No (n (%))

PROM

Rationale for Assessment

PROM administration

Gavaler (1991) [66]

USA

Cross- sectional study

23 (23)

Quiescent group: 34.7 (6.2) Symptomatic group: 39.8 (1.6)

15 (65%)

Symptomatic UC:

Mild: 7 (40%)

Moderate: 8 (47%)

Severe: 2 (13%)

NR

Yes (23 (100%))

Yes (23 (100%))

Study questionnaire: symptoms of UC

A

Postal & telephone

Gross (1999) [26]

USA

Before & after study

157 (92)

Total sample: 50 (10)

31 (34%)

NR

MRS: Mean 5.3

NR

Yes (157 (100%))

NIDDK-QA, pilot version NIDDKQA

A

Clinic

Kim (2000) [28]

USA

Validation study

96 (17)

45 (9.3)

7 (41%)

PSC undergoing LT: 17 (100%)

MRS: mean (SD) = −0.1(1.0)

NR

PSC patients undergoing LT: 17 (100%)

NIDDK-QA, SF- 36

D

Clinic

Bharucha (2000) [67]

USA

Pilot study

20 (20)

44 (11)

12 (60%)

Early stage (1–2): 10 (50%),

Late stage (3–4): 10 (50%)

MRS: mean (SD) = 2.87 (0.95)

Yes (14 (70%))

No

Grading system fatigue & pruritus

B

Unclear

Younossi (2000) [38]

USA

Cross-sectional study

104 (29)

Total sample:: 55 (12)

Total sample 28 (97%)

NR

NR

NR

No

SF- 36, CLDQ

A

Unclear

Younossi (2001) [39]

USA

Cross-sectional study

353 (45)

Total sample: 54 (11)

Total sample 38 (30%)

Total sample: Child-pugh class: no cirrhosis: 47 (13%)

class A: 43 (12%)

class B-27 (8%) class C-4 (1%)

NR

NR

NR

SF-36, CLDQ

A

Clinic

Longworth (2003) [45]

England and Wales

Cost effectiveness study

347 (70)

NR

48 (69%)

NR

Of 41 patients MELD score median/IQR = 10/6–16

NR

Yes (45) 64%))

EuroQol EQ. 5D

C

Postal

Bjornsson (2004) [44]

England & Sweden

RCT

93 (20)

NR

13 (65%)

Cirrhosis: 5 (1%),Ludwig’s fibrosis score stage 1: 9 (44%), stage 2: 4(21%), stage 3:6(30%)

NR

Yes (16 (80%))

No

PGWB, FIS, BDI, GSRS, Rome ll modular QA

A

Postal

Ter Borg (2004) [36]

Netherlands

RCT

33 (11)

NR

10 (91%)

NR

NR

NR

No

VAS, FFSS, MFI

B

NR

Ter Borg (2005) [48]

Netherlands

Cross-sectional study

72 (27)

45 (NR)

19 (70%)

Cirrhosis: 15 (56%)

NR

Yes (2 (7%)

NR

VAS, FFSS, SF-36

A

NR

Olsson (2005) [33]

Sweden, Norway, Denmark

RCT

198 (198)

UDCA: 43.6(12.7) Placebo: 43.1 (11.2)

139 (70%)

NR

NR

Yes (168 (85%))

NR

SF- 36

B

Unclear

Gorgun (2005) [21]

USA

Case matched study

65 (65)

43.37 (11.2)

45 (69%)

NR

NR

Yes

(65 (100%))

No

FPQ, CGQOL

A

 

Mansour-Ghanaei (2006) [49]

Iran

RCT

34 (6)

Total sample: 53.97 (11.93)

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

VAS

B

Unclear

Mayo (2007) [50]

USA

RCT

21 (4)

Total sample: 53.97 (11.93)

Total sample 5 (15%)

NR

aTotal sample MELD mean (range): 11(6–24)

NR

NR

VAS, IDS-SR30

B

Unclear

Van os (2007) [52]

Netherlands

Cross-sectional study

92(37)

43.8(12.3)

24 (65%)

Cirrhosis: 5 (13.5%)

NR)

NR

NR

BDI, SADS

A

Postal

Tillman (2009) [37]

Germany

Cross-sectional study

511(13)

42 (NR)

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

SF- 36, FIS, WHOQOL-BREF, HADS

A

In clinic

Ananthakrishnan (2010) [47]

USA

Case-control study

26 (26)

40.7 (14.8)

21 (80.8%)

NR

MELD score mean (range) 8 (6–20)

Yes (26(100%))

No

SIBDQ, HBI, UCAI

A

Outpatient clinic

Aberg (2012) [30]

Finland

Cross-sectional study

401 (56)

53 (9)

36 (64%)

NR

NR

NR

Yes (56 (100%))

15D, ad hoc questionnaire

A

Postal

Benito De Valle (2012) [29]

England & Sweden

Cross-sectional study

182 (182)

160 patients no LT: 50 (16)

112 (70%)

Small duct disease: 17 (11%), Liver cirrhosis: 12 (8%), Decompensated liver disease: 9 (6%)

MRS mean (SD): 0.34 (1.10)

Yes (126 (79%))

Yes (22 (12%))

SF-36, CLDQ, FIS, HADS

A

Postal

Hagstrom (2012) [68]

Sweden

Cross-sectional study

96 (96)

47 (13)

63 (66%)

Cases child pugh score of 10, significant fibrosis: 26 (27%), non-significant fibrosis: 70 (73%)

NR

Yes (73 (76%))

Yes (12 (12.5%))

LDH

A

Interview

Gulati (2013) [25]

USA

Cross-sectional study

40 (24)

Total sample: 11.6 (4.5)

17 (43%)

Total sample: Cirrhosis 22 (55%)

NR

Total sample: Yes (16 (65%))

No

 

A

Unclear

Block (2014) [69]

Norway & Sweden

Case-control study

48 (48)

NR

40 (83%)

NR

NR

48

Yes (IPAA: 11, IRA: 7)

OS

A

Scheduled follow up visit

Gotthardt (2014) [6]

Germany

Cross-sectional study

113

(113)

43.6 (14.2)

81 (71.7%)

NR

MRS n: low/intermediate/ high =48 (42%) / 25 (22%) / 5 (4%)

Yes (71 (63%))

NR

SF 36, PHQ-9

A

Postal

Hov (2014) [70]

Norway

Case-control study

240

(240)

NR

171 (71%)

NR

NR

Yes (183 (77%))

Yes (94 (39%))

Study questionnaire

A

Postal

Pavlides (2014) [34]

England

Retrospective case note review

40 (PSC-IPAA = 21 & PSC-UC = 19)

NR

31 (78%)

PSC-IPAA had dysplasia: 2 (5%)

NR

Yes (19 (47.5%))

No

OS, CGQOL, FSFI, IIEF

A

Postal

Raszeja-Wyszomirska (2014) [35]

Poland

Cross-sectional study

102 (102)

36 (12)

73 (72%)

Cirrhosis: 30 (29%)

NR

Yes (65 (64%))

NR

SF 36, PBC-40, PBC-27

A

Unclear

Cheung (2015) [32]

Canada

Cross-sectional study

162 (99)

46.1 (15.1)

50 (51%)

Cirrhosis: 47 (48%), Decompensated liver disease: 16 (16%)

NR

Yes (74)

No

SF-36, PBC-40, PHQ-9, LDQOL, SIBDQ, 10 peered-reviewed QA on emotional and psychosocial

A

Postal or clinic

Dyson (2015) [20]

USA

Cross-sectional study

40 (40)

51 (13)

31 (78%)

NR

NR

Yes (24 (60%))

NR

FIS, ESS, HADs, COMPASS

A

Postal

Eaton (2015) [71]

Canada & USA

Case-control study

1000

(1000)

NR

619 (72%)

NR

NR

Yes (741 ((74%))

Yes (450 ((45%))

HHQ

A

Postal or clinic

Haapamaki (2015) [31]

Finland

Cross-sectional study

341

(341)

43.3 (13.7)

183 (54%)

ERC-score mean (SD): 5.9 (3.4)

NR

Yes (237 (69.5%))

Yes (9 (2.6%))

15D, study questionnaire

A

ERC examination at the HUGH endoscopy unit

Kalaitzakis (2015) [27]

England and Sweden

Cross-sectional study

163

(163)

No LT: 50 (16)

No LT

122 (75%)

No LT Small-duct disease: 15 (10%), Diver cirrhosis: 11 (8%), Decompensated liver disease: 8 (6%)

No LT MRS: mean (SD) = 0.11(1.42)

No LT Yes (116 (71%))

Yes (19 (12%))

SF 36, SF-6D, CLDQ, study questionnaire

A, C

Unclear

Raszeja-Wyszomirska (2015) [41]

Poland

Cross-sectional study

33 (33)

35.3 (13.38)

11 (33%)

Cirrhosis: 6 (18%)

NR

Yes (22 (67%)

NR

SF 36, PBC-40, PBC-27

A

NR

Carbone (2017) [46]

Italy

Longitudinal study

227 (64)

50(11)

39 (66%)

NR

NR

NR

NR

EQ-5D

A

Clinic

Kempinska (2017) [40]

Poland

Cohort study

275 (275)

Median 55, range 28–90

182 (66%)

NR

NR

NR

NR

SF 36, PBC-40, PBC-27

A

NR

Kittanamongkolchai (2017) [51]

USA

Before and after study

13 (5)

46.4 (13.2)

1 (20%)

NR

NR

NR

NR

Pruritus numerical rating scale

B

Physician administered

Tabibian (2017) [42]

USA

Pilot study

16 (16)

40 (NR)

13 (81%)

All patients had stage 1–3 PSC

NR

13 (81%)

NR

FFSS, 5-D itch scale, CLDQ, SF-36

B

NR

Younossi (2017) [43]

USA

Validation study

102 (102)

44 (13)

33 (32%)

Cirrhosis: 37 (39%)

NR

67 (68%)

NR

PSC PRO, SF-36, CLDQ, PBC-40, 5-D Itch

D

ePRO website

  1. 15D 15-dimensional health-related quality of life measure, 5-D Itch Five dimensions Itch, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, CGQOL Cleveland global quality of life questionnaire, CLDQ Chronic liver disease questionnaire, COMPASS Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale, ESS Epworth Sleepiness Scale, EQ. 5D EuroQol EQ. 5D, FFSS Fisk Fatigue Severity Scale, FIS Fatigue Impact Scale, FSFI Female Sexual Satisfaction Index, GSRS Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, HADS Hospital anxiety and depression scale, HBI Harvey-Bradshaw Index, HHQ Health Habits and History Questionnaires, IBD Inflammatory Bowel Disease, IDS-SR30 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self report, IIEF International index of erectile function, LDH Lifetime drinking history, LDQOL Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire, LT Liver Transplant, MELD Model For End-Stage Liver Disease, MFI Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, MRS Mayo Risk Score, NIDDK-QA National institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney disease liver transplant questionnaire, NR Not Reported, OS Oresland Scale, PBC-40 Primary Biliary Cirrhosis, PF Pouch Function Questionnaire, PGWB Psychological general well-being index, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire, PSC PRO Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis patient-reported outcome, RCT Randomised Controlled Trial, SADS Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, SD Standard Deviation, SF-36 Short form 36, SIBDQ Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, UC Ulcerative Colitis, UCAI UC Activity Index, VAS Visual Analogue Scale, WHOQOL-BREF World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument
  2. aRationale for assessment: A; Burden (HRQOL /symptom) of disease, B: Effectiveness of treatment, C: Cost Effectiveness/Health Utilities, D:Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure, (PROM)