Skip to main content

Table 4 Evaluation of the PAI questionnaires by professionals

From: Feasibility of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) and Young Adults (PAI-YA) with a visual impairment: a pilot study

Item in evaluation questionnaire Rating Number of professionals (%) Statements
Insight in rehabilitation needs client + 2 (12%) Gives insight in possibilities and limitations, but not in rehabilitation needs
± 7 (41%)
- 8 (47%)
Insight in possibilities and limitations client + 8 (47%) Nice questionnaire to go more into depth; responses to questionnaire give limited information; good to have responses of parent and child
± 6 (35%)
- 3 (18%)
Estimated perception of client regarding questionnaire + 12 (71%) Difficult to fill in for parents because of language use; some items are not applicable because of age; nice to have comment boxes; unclear whether questionnaire should be filled in as using visual aids; response option don’t know is lacking
± 5 (29%)
- 0 (0%)
Clarification of rehabilitation needs using questionnaire + 5 (29%) Unclear what rehabilitation wishes/needs are
± 0 (0%)
- 12 (71%)
Contribution in development rehabilitation plan + 0 (0%) No further comments
± 17 (100%)
- 0 (0%)
Satisfaction about duration + 14 (82%) No further comments
± 1 (6%)
- 2 (12%)
Correspondence available products to identified needs + 1 (6%) No further comments
± 12 (71%)
- 4 (24%)
Identification of additional rehabilitation needs + 6 (35%) Able to identify additional needs that would not have been identified using a semi-structured interview
± 2 (12%)
- 9 (53%)