Skip to main content

Table 4 Evaluation of the PAI questionnaires by professionals

From: Feasibility of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) and Young Adults (PAI-YA) with a visual impairment: a pilot study

Item in evaluation questionnaire

Rating

Number of professionals (%)

Statements

Insight in rehabilitation needs client

+

2 (12%)

Gives insight in possibilities and limitations, but not in rehabilitation needs

±

7 (41%)

-

8 (47%)

Insight in possibilities and limitations client

+

8 (47%)

Nice questionnaire to go more into depth; responses to questionnaire give limited information; good to have responses of parent and child

±

6 (35%)

-

3 (18%)

Estimated perception of client regarding questionnaire

+

12 (71%)

Difficult to fill in for parents because of language use; some items are not applicable because of age; nice to have comment boxes; unclear whether questionnaire should be filled in as using visual aids; response option don’t know is lacking

±

5 (29%)

-

0 (0%)

Clarification of rehabilitation needs using questionnaire

+

5 (29%)

Unclear what rehabilitation wishes/needs are

±

0 (0%)

-

12 (71%)

Contribution in development rehabilitation plan

+

0 (0%)

No further comments

±

17 (100%)

-

0 (0%)

Satisfaction about duration

+

14 (82%)

No further comments

±

1 (6%)

-

2 (12%)

Correspondence available products to identified needs

+

1 (6%)

No further comments

±

12 (71%)

-

4 (24%)

Identification of additional rehabilitation needs

+

6 (35%)

Able to identify additional needs that would not have been identified using a semi-structured interview

±

2 (12%)

-

9 (53%)