Skip to main content

Table 4 Known group validity testing: effect sizes (ES) of the differences within the testicular cancer sample between the known groups based on comorbidity status, age, education and marital status

From: International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer

 

TCa survivors

Co-morbidities

Age

Education

Marital status

0 comorbiditiesa

1 or more co-morbidities

Younger than 40a

40–50

50 and older

Universitya

Higher education

High school or less

Singlea

Partner

SF36: Physical Functioning

 

−0.66

 

−0.33

−0.41

 

−0.11

−0.58

 

0.61

SF36: Role-Physical

 

−0.62

 

−0.09

−0.12

 

−0.20

−0.24

 

0.93

SF36: Bodily Pain

 

−0.84

 

−0.34

−0.28

 

0.00

−0.14

 

0.64

SF36: General Health

 

−0.55

 

−0.37

−0.21

 

0.03

−0.16

 

0.74

SF36: Vitality

 

−0.61

 

−0.07

−0.13

 

0.13

−0.10

 

0.52

SF36: Social Functioning

 

−0.49

 

−0.10

0.17

 

−0.18

−0.10

 

0.93

SF36: Role-Emotional

 

−0.27

 

0.06

0.07

 

−0.21

−0.24

 

0.64

SF36: Mental Health

 

−0.20

 

0.37

0.58

 

−0.18

−0.11

 

0.65

QLQ-C30: Global health status/QoL

 

−0.36

 

−0.09

0.20

 

0.01

−0.29

 

0.67

QLQ-C30: Physical Function

 

−0.69

 

−0.29

−0.27

 

0.07

−0.42

 

0.75

QLQ-C30: Role Function

 

−0.55

 

−0.19

0.08

 

0.04

−0.43

 

0.90

QLQ-C30: Emotional Function

 

−0.48

 

0.01

0.17

 

0.04

−0.26

 

0.86

QLQ-C30: Cognitive Function

 

−0.48

 

−0.07

−0.30

 

−0.06

0.08

 

0.74

QLQ-C30: Social Function

 

−0.47

 

−0.07

0.12

 

0.14

0.01

 

0.66

QLQ-C30: Fatigue

 

−0.81

 

−0.07

−0.38

 

0.12

−0.31

 

0.76

QLQ-C30: Nausea / vomiting

 

−0.40

 

0.12

0.17

 

−0.12

−0.25

 

0.55

QLQ-C30: Pain

 

−0.80

 

−0.20

−0.19

 

0.13

−0.13

 

0.63

QLQ-C30: Dyspnoea

 

−0.45

 

−0.21

−0.40

 

0.27

−0.37

 

0.19

QLQ-C30: Insomnia

 

−0.43

 

0.15

0.14

 

−0.03

−0.04

 

0.73

QLQ-C30: Appetite loss

 

−0.17

 

0.06

0.10

 

0.04

−0.33

 

0.60

QLQ-C30: Constipation

 

−0.24

 

−0.10

−0.03

 

0.31

0.06

 

0.48

QLQ-C30: Diarrhoea

 

−0.03

 

−0.13

0.04

 

0.59

0.56

 

0.15

QLQ-C30: Financial problems

 

−0.37

 

0.06

−0.40

 

0.09

−0.12

 

0.41

IOC: Appearance concerns

 

−0.13

 

0.19

0.35

 

0.07

−0.07

 

0.31

IOC: Body change concerns

 

−0.41

 

−0.15

−0.32

 

−0.06

−0.30

 

0.34

IOC: Life interferences

 

−0.33

 

−0.01

−0.02

 

−0.07

−0.14

 

0.65

IOC: Worry

 

−0.42

 

−0.06

0.12

 

0.02

−0.19

 

0.23

IOC: Negative Impact Scale

 

−0.42

 

−0.04

0.04

 

−0.02

−0.25

 

0.50

TC26: Satisfaction with care

 

−0.23

 

−0.08

−0.17

 

0.02

0.03

 

−0.06

TC26: Future perspective

 

−0.32

 

0.01

0.07

 

−0.04

−0.36

 

0.52

TC26: Communication

 

0.05

 

0.16

−0.16

 

−0.22

−0.04

 

0.04

TC26: Sexual activity

 

−0.30

 

−0.17

−0.66

 

−0.19

−0.13

 

0.56

TC26: Sexual enjoyment

 

−0.30

 

0.00

−0.54

 

−0.15

−0.27

 

0.57

TC26: Satisfaction with testicular implant

 

−0.36

 

0.76

0.50

 

−0.09

−0.78

 

0.26

TC26: Treatment side effects

 

−0.57

 

−0.10

−0.08

 

−0.04

−0.14

 

0.52

TC26: Job problems

 

−0.34

 

−0.01

0.15

 

−0.02

−0.31

 

0.48

TC26: Family problems

 

−0.17

 

−0.05

0.07

 

0.18

−0.18

 

0.09

TC26: Infertility

 

0.06

 

0.70

1.07

 

0.14

0.04

 

0.23

TC26: Body Image

 

−0.26

 

0.31

0.14

 

0.36

0.01

 

0.54

TC26: Sexual problems

 

−0.38

 

0.17

−0.23

 

−0.19

−0.06

 

0.36

QPS: Work Motivation

 

−0.28

 

−0.05

0.49

 

−0.03

0.03

 

0.49

QPS: Job and life satisfaction

 

−0.21

 

−0.01

0.21

 

−0.03

0.05

 

0.51

QPS: Work ability

 

−0.37

 

−0.23

−0.50

 

−0.26

−0.37

 

0.59

QPS: Self-efficacy

 

−0.13

 

−0.41

−0.37

 

−0.28

−0.27

 

−0.27

  1. Effect sizes are displayed in bold in those cases where the known groups differed significantly (p ≤ .05). TCa testicular cancer
  2. A positive effect size reflects better HRQoL than the reference group, and a negative effect size reflects worse HRQoL than the reference group
  3. areference group