Skip to main content

Table 3 Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Short Form (SF)-36 subscales

From: Comparing health-related quality of life of Dutch and Chinese patients with traumatic brain injury: do cultural differences play a role?

  

Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Zhuhai, China

Observed variable

Latent construct

ß

B

p-value

ß

B

p-value

PF

Physical

1.00a

0.78

NA

1.00a

0.60

NA

RP

Physical

2.02

0.94

< .01

3.58

0.88

< .01

BP

Physical

1.04

0.76

< .01

2.04

0.77

< .01

GH

Physical

0.48

0.45

< .01

1.25

0.52

.01

VT

Physical

0.01

0.01

.94

−2.31

−0.97

.18

GH

Mental

0.59

0.45

< .01

0.49

0.28

.14

VT

Mental

1.06

0.86

< .01

2.87

1.65

.03

SF

Mental

1.13

0.88

< .01

1.19

0.75

< .01

RE

Mental

1.39

0.70

< .01

1.89

0.63

< .01

MH

Mental

1.00a

0.86

NA

1.00a

0.67

NA

  1. Note: Table represents unstandardized (ß) and standardized (B) regression weights between subscales and the physical and mental component for both the Dutch and the Chinese mild and moderate traumatic brain injury patients 12 months post-injury
  2. Abbreviations: PF Physical functioning, RP Role physical, BP Bodily pain, GH General health, VT Vitality, SF Social functioning, RE Role-emotional, MH Mental health
  3. aRegression weight was set to 1.00
  4. *Statistically significant (p < .05) association
  5.  = strong association between subscale and rotated principal component is expected based on previous research [30, 37]
  6.  = weak/no association between subscale and rotated principal component is expected based on previous research [30, 37]