Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of mean changes and percentage changes between 6 months’ and 12 months’ follow-up for the three groups

From: Health related quality of life assessment in acute coronary syndrome patients: the effectiveness of early phase I cardiac rehabilitation

  MCRP (n = 15) CCRP (n = 15) Control (n = 26)
Mean difference (%) Mean difference (%) Mean difference (%)
Components
 PCS 3.95 8.90 4.26 9.69 a 3.69 9.12 b
 MCS 9.23 21.75 a,b 3.32 6.89 4.69 10.90
Domains
 PF 14.78 21.67 a 7.67 10.27 6.32 9.76
 RP 16.67 37.04 16.67 40.00 15.38 42.10 b
 BP 12.27 17.97 a 4.60 6.56 6.38 10.20
 GH 12.51 21.62 b 13.87 25.36 b 14.58 28.52 a,b
 VT 14.33 24.43 8.00 12.63 13.97 26.58 a,b
 SF 14.17 21.25 a 6.67 8.79 5.77 9.09
 RE 22.22 c 55.55 a 8.88 19.03 12.83 34.50
 MH 21.07 c 33.48 a,b 6.93 9.19 b 9.23 13.86
  1. aHighest percentage of mean differences among the three groups
  2. b p value for paired t-test is significant at p < 0.05
  3. cMCID with reference point as 20-points differences in changes over time with the SF-36 (Ware et al., 1993; Wyrwich et al., 2004; Kemmler et al., 2010)