Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationships between different forms of victimisation and four dysfunction domains of the DHP-A among Vietnamese high school students - multiple linear regressionsa,b (all forms of victimisation were entered simultaneously into the same models)

From: Victimisation, poly-victimisation and health-related quality of life among high school students in Vietnam: a cross-sectional survey

 

Anxiety

Depression

Pain

Disability

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Adjusted β (95 % CI)

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Girls

Boys

Any property victimisation (yes vs no)

2.6 (−0.3; 5.5)

2.8 (−0.1; 5.6)

2.9 (−0.5; 6.3)

1.6 (−1.7; 4.9)

8.1 (2.8; 13.3)

1.4 (−3.4; 6.1)

2.7 (−1.0; 6.5)

−2.7 (−6.8; 1.5)

Any physical assault (yes vs no)

1.8 (−1.0; 4.7)

3.7 (0.8; 6.7)

2.8 (−0.6; 6.1)

4.3 (0.9; 7.7)

0.2 (−5.0; 5.3)

1.8 (−3.1; 6.8)

−0.5 (−4.2; 3.2)

3.7 (−0.6; 8.0)

Any child maltreatment (yes vs no)

3.6 (0.5; 6.6)

4.4 (1.6; 7.2)

2.1 (−1.5; 5.7)

4.8 (1.6; 8.0)

3.2 (−2.3; 8.7)

6.1 (1.4; 10.8)

−3.8 (−7.8; 0.1)

2.3 (−1.8; 6.4)

Any peer or sibling victimisation (yes vs no)

1.3 (−1.6; 4.1)

3.4 (0.4; 6.3)

−0.3 (−3.7; 3.0)

4.0 (0.6; 7.4)

1.9 (−3.2; 7.0)

3.1 (−1.9; 8.0)

1.0 (−2.6; 4.7)

2.0 (−2.4; 6.3)

Any sexual victimisation (yes vs no)

1.1 (−1.7; 4.0)

3.5 (0.2; 6.8)

3.4 (0.02; 6.8)

3.2 (−0.7; 7.1)

−1.3 (−6.4; 3.8)

3.3 (−2.3; 8.8)

0.4 (−3.2; 4.1)

−3.1 (−8.0; 1.8)

Any witnessing of family violence (yes vs no)

2.1 (−0.9; 5.1)

1.1 (−1.7; 4.0)

2.5 (−1.1; 6.0)

0.9 (−2.3; 4.2)

1.2 (−4.3; 6.7)

1.9 (−2.8; 6.6)

−1.2 (−5.1; 2.7)

−0.9 (−5.0; 3.2)

Any witnessing of community violence (yes vs no)

−3.2 (−6.7; 0.3)

−2.2 (−5.3; 1.0)

−3.5 (−7.7; 0.6)

−3.9 (−7.5; −0.2)

3.9 (−2.4; 10.3)

−0.2 (−5.5; 5.1)

−0.1 (−4.7; 4.4)

−1.9 (−6.4; 2.7)

Any cyber victimisation (yes vs no)

5.6 (2.7; 8.5)

2.5 (−0.4; 5.4)

6.6 (3.1; 10.0)

5.2 (1.8; 8.6)

5.8 (0.4; 11.2)

3.8 (−1.2; 8.8)

4.2 (0.4; 7.8)

−0.1 (−4.4; 4.2)

  1. aModel adjusted for age, rural/ urban residence, family composition, socio-economic status, presence of a chronic disease or disability, school type and number of adverse life events experienced
  2. bSignificant results are in bold