Skip to main content

Table 4 Distribution of Short Form-36 and Hepatitis B Quality of Life subscale scores of patients with hepatitis B by disease status at study entry

From: Quality of life and related factors among chronic hepatitis B-infected patients: a multi-center study, Turkey

 

Group-1 (n = 1529)

Group-2 (n = 1721)

Group-3 (n = 1007)

p value

All patients (n = 4257)

SF-36

 Physical functioning

90 (70;100)

85 (60;100)

90 (65;100)

<0,001 ┼, ╪,0,203§

90 (65;100)

 Role physical,

100 (50;100)

100 (25;100)

100 (25;100)

<0,001 ┼, ╪,0,721§

100 (50;100)

 Role emotional

100 (33,3;100)

100 (33,3;100)

100 (33,3;100)

0,001 ┼,0,004 ╪, 0,859§

100 (33,3;100)

 Vitality

50 (45;70)

55 (45;70)

55 (40;70)

0,060┼,0,167╪,0,819§

55 (40;70)

 Mental health

72 (52;84)

68 (52;80)

68 (52;80)

0,005 ┼,<0,001 ╪, 0,016 §

68 (52;84)

 Social functioning

87,5 (62,5;100)

87,5 (62,5;100)

87,5 (50;100)

0,012 ┼,<0,001 ╪,0,006 §

87,5 (62,5;100)

 Bodily pain

100 (67,5;100)

90 (67,5;100)

90 (65;100)

0,185┼, <0,001 ╪,0,013 §

90 (67,5;100)

 General health

65 (45;75)

60 (45;70)

60 (45;75)

<0,001 ┼, ╪,0,775§

60 (45;75)

 Physical component score

79 (58,5;86)

74 (54,5;84)

74 (54;85)

<0,001 ┼, ╪,0,644§

75,5 (55,5;85)

 Mental component score

74 (52,4;81,8)

69,4 (50;80)

67,8 (49;80,8)

<0,001 ┼,╪,0,511§

70,6 (50,3;80,8)

HBQOL

 Psychological Well-Being

90 (67,5;97,5)

85 (70;95)

82,5 (65;95)

0,019 ┼,<0,001 ╪,0,090§

85 (67,5;95)

 Anticipation anxiety

80 (56,7;93,3)

76,6 (53,3;90)

70 (50;90)

0,008 ┼, <0,001 ╪, 0,001 §

76,6 (53,3;93,3)

 Vitality

80 (64;88)

76 (64;88)

76 (60;88)

<0,001 ┼,0,001 ╪,0,758§

80 (64;88)

 Stigma

93,3 (73,3;100)

90 (73,3;100)

90 (70;100)

0,056┼, 0,001 ╪,0,071§

90 (73,3;100)

 Vulnerability

80 (60;93,3)

80 (60;93,3)

73,3 (53,3;93,3)

<0,001 ┼,╪,0,300§

80 (60;93,3)

 Total score

85 (67,1;93,6)

80,7 (66,4;91,4)

79,3 (63,9;90,7)

<0,001 ┼,╪,0,024 §

81,4 (65,7;92,1)

  1. SF-36 Short Form-36, HBQOL Hepatitis B Quality of Life, Median (25 %, 75 %) are presented, Bonferroni correction was used, ┼significant difference was obtained in comparing group 1 and 2, ╪significant difference was observed between group 1 and 3, §significant difference was observed between group 2 and 3, bold data reflected a statistical significance