| |
χ
2 (df)
|
χ
2/df
|
RMSEA (90 % CI)
|
Comparison
|
∆χ
2 (∆df)
|
p
|
|---|
|
Model 1a
|
704.92 (388)
|
1.81
|
0.06 (0.05–0.06)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Model 2b
|
743.48 (424)
|
1.75
|
0.05 (0.05–0.06)
|
Model 1 vs. Model 2
|
38.57 (36)
|
0.354
|
|
Model 3c
|
775.72 (454)
|
1.71
|
0.05 (0.04–0.06)
|
Model 2 vs. Model 3
|
32.24 (30)
|
0.357
|
|
Model 4d
|
834.67 (505)
|
1.65
|
0.05 (0.04–0.06)
|
Model 3 vs. Model 4
|
58.95 (51)
|
0.207
|
-
aConfigural Model: No equality constraints imposed
-
bAll factor loadings constrained equal
-
cAll factor loadings and covariances among 4 factors constrained equal
-
dAll factor loadings, covariances among 4 factors, and error variance constrained equal
- ∆χ
2= difference in χ
2 values between models
- ∆df = difference in number of degrees of freedom between models
