Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation’s matrix of factors of the FACT-G and EORTC QLQ-C30 (version fitted to the sample)

From: Psychometric characteristics of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General when applied to Brazilian cancer patients: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation

  

FACT-G

EORTC QLQ-C30

 

Factorsa

PWB

SFWB

EWB

FWB

QL

PF

RF

EF

CF

SF

FA

NV

PA

SPUR

FACT-G

PWB

1

             

SFWB

-.17

1

            

EWB

.61

-.38

1

           

FWB

-.65

.57

-.75

1

          

EORTC QLQ-C30

QL

-.61

.34

-.53

.73

1

         

PF

.87

-.14

.45

-.64

-.46

1

        

RF

.79

-.07

.44

-.70

-.49

.92

1

       

EF

.60

-.26

.90

-.51

-.47

.47

.46

1

      

CF

.49

-.21

.46

-.34

-.27

.47

.49

.42

1

     

SF

.46

-.24

.45

-.62

-.55

.47

.54

.50

.34

1

    

FA

.92

-.08

.55

-.58

-.51

.82

.81

.51

.59

.43

1

   

NV

.98

.01

.28

-.27

-.23

.43

.48

.32

.30

.21

.61

1

  

PA

1.00

-.12

0.42

-.47

-.44

.58

.61

.48

.42

.38

.68

.32

1

 

SPUR

.93

-.16

.58

-.71

-.47

.81

.78

.62

.65

.36

.98

.84

.68

1

  1. aFACT-G: PWB physical well-being, SFWB social family well-being, EWB emotional well-being, FWB functional well-being; EORTC QLQ-C30: QL overall quality of life (global score), PF physical functioning, RF role functioning, EF emotional functioning, CF cognitive functioning, SF social functioning, FA fatigue, NV nausea and vomiting, PA pain, SPU spurious (single terms)