Mapping and direct valuation: do they give equivalent EQ-5D-5L index scores?

Table 4 Responsiveness to change of the two EQ-5D-5L index scores

Health indicator	Effect size (standard error)		Difference in effect size (90 % confidence interval)
Health indicator	Valuation-derived index score	Mapping-derived index score	Difference in effect size (90 % confidence interval)
Reported a change in performance status (N = 78)
Change in self-assessed performance status	0.064 (0.016)	0.071 (0.025)	−0.007 (−0.025 to 0.011)^a
Change in FACT-B total score (per 20-point increment)	0.106 (0.024)	0.109 (0.038)	−0.003 (−0.030 to 0.024)^a
Change in FACT-G total score (per 20-point increment)	0.119 (0.027)	0.126 (0.042)	−0.007 (−0.037 to 0.024)^a
Change in EQ-VAS (per 20-point increment)	0.097 (0.022)	0.108 (0.034)	−0.011 (−0.035 to 0.014)^a
Reported a change in health status (N = 129)
Patient’s self-rated change in health status	0.044 (0.007)	0.055 (0.011)	−0.010 (−0.019 to −0.002)^a
Change in FACT-B total score (per 20-point increment)	0.081 (0.018)	0.081 (0.029)	0.001 (−0.019 to 0.020)^a
Change in FACT-G total score (per 20-point increment)	0.101 (0.020)	0.107 (0.029)	−0.007 (−0.029 to 0.015)^a
Change in EQ-VAS (per 20-point increment)	0.114 (0.017)	0.142 (0.026)	−0.028 (−0.048 to −0.008)^a

ISSN: 1477-7525