Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of SF-36 subscales between the patients who had undergone one of the three types of lithotripsy: percutaneous (n = 97), ureteroscopic (n = 118) or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL, n = 60)

From: Study of quality of life and its determinants in patients after urinary stone fragmentation

SF-36 Subscale

lithotripsy type

Mean

SD

F Statistic

P-Value

Physical Functioning (PF)

Percutaneous

38.92

13.28

 

0.000

 

Ureteroscopy

47.84

8.02

32.82

 
 

ESWL

51.23

2.72

  

Role-Physical (RP)

Percutaneous

43.37

8.13

 

0.000

 

Ureteroscopy

47.63

7.78

16.95

 
 

ESWL

50.24

5.83

  

Body Pain (BP)

Percutaneous

48.06

9.74

 

0.002

 

Ureteroscopy

45.02

7.42

6.16

 
 

ESWL

49.24

5.83

  

General Health (GH)

Percutaneous

47.50

8.46

 

0.007

 

Ureteroscopy

49.85

8.77

5.01

 
 

ESWL

51.68

6.79

  

Vitality (VT)

Percutaneous

51.500

9.45

 

0.000

 

Ureteroscopy

55.52

10.33

19.4

 
 

ESWL

61.76

10.68

  

Social Functioning (SF)

Percutaneous

42.45

10.30

 

0.000

 

Ureteroscopy

42.93

9.58

9.36

 
 

ESWL

48.66

7.54

  

Role-Emotional (RE)

Percutaneous

39.64

11.31

 

0.000

 

Ureteroscoy

45.93

9.44

26.11

 
 

ESWL

50.82

6.87

  

Mental Health (MH)

Percutaneous

44.08

10.09

 

0.000

 

Ureteroscopy

49.38

10.46

26.23

 
 

ESWL

56.01

9.16

 Â