Skip to main content

Table 8 Impact of socio-economic status on HRQoL children self reports and parents proxy report

From: Measuring adolescents' HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument

 

Socio-economic statusa

  
 

Low

Medium

High

d-effect sizeb

d-effect sizeb

    

all

11–13/14–17 years

N

2036

3507

1880

  
 

Mean

Mean

Mean

  

Self Report

     

Total

71.89

72.71

73.38

-0.14**

-0.15/-0.11

Physical

70.13

70.61

71.35

-0.07 ns

-0.07/-0.09

Psychological

80.86

81.16

81.52

-0.05 ns

-0.17/0.01

Self-Esteem

57.55

58.40

58.92

-0.07*

0.17/-0.24

Family

81.79

81.72

82.59

-0.05 ns

-0.17/0.01

Friends

77.51

77.99

76.34

0.08**

0.02/0.10

School

63.56

66.31

69.65

-0.36**

-0.39/-0.37

Parent Report

     

Total

73.44

74.23

75.10

-0.16**

-0.21/-0.13

Physical

72.49

74.22

75.64

-0.18**

-0.26/-0.14

Psychological

78.50

79.17

79.99

-0.11**

-0.14/-0.05

Self-Esteem

66.48

67.37

68.07

-0.07**

-0.08/-0.06

Family

76.28

76.17

76.84

0.04ns

-0.01/0.02

Friends

77.54

77.39

75.97

0.01ns

0.05/-0.01

School

69.24

71.16

74.13

-0.13**

-0.19/-0.12

  1. Standard errors (SE) for the means: low SES = 0.24 – 0.45 (self) vs. 0.17 – 0.28 (parent); medium SES = 0.18 – 0.31 (self) vs. 0.17 – 0.30 (parent); high SES = 0.23 – 0.39 (self) vs. 0.23 – 0.39 (parent); 95% confidence intervals = mean +/- 1.96*SE)
  2. aSocioeconomic status classification according to the Winkler Index [27].
  3. b"d"-effect size for comparison between low and high socioeconomic status (0.2 = small; 0.5 = medium; 0.8 = large effect)
  4. * statistical significant (p < .05) F-value in ANOVA; ** statistical significant (p < 0.01) F-value in ANOVA
  5. No statistically significant interaction was observed for mode * socio-economic status
  6. All statistical interactions between mode (parent versus self) and CSHCN were statistically significant
  7. All statistical interactions between mode (parent versus self) and weight status were statistically non-significant except for KINDL Psych (p = 0.011; "f" = 0.04 [marginal effect]).