Table 3 Data used to illustrate the flaw in Hankins's argument that Scale II is more discriminating than Scale I.
Observation | Weight I | Weight II |
|---|---|---|
1 | 100 | 100.057 |
2 | 100 | 100.817 |
3 | 100 | 100.045 |
4 | 100 | 100.678 |
5 | 100 | 100.233 |
6 | 100 | 100.566 |
7 | 100 | 100.344 |
8 | 100 | 100.287 |
9 | 100 | 100.456 |
10 | 100 | 100.653 |