Skip to main content

Table 8 Known-groups validity of the EQ-5D index scores using UK, US, and Japan preference weights

From: A comparison of EQ-5D index scores using the UK, US, and Japan preference weights in a Thai sample with type 2 diabetes

 

No.

UK

US

Japan

Relative Precisiona

Relative Precisionb

Relative Precisionc

HbA1c < 7%

110

0.79

0.83

0.77

   

HbA1c ≤ 7%

193

0.75

0.80

0.73

   

Difference

 

0.04

0.03*

0.04*

   

Z statistic

 

-1.91

-2.00

-2.59

0.96

1.36

1.30

Neuropathy (No)

179

0.81

0.84

0.79

   

Neuropathy (Yes)

124

0.69

0.77

0.69

   

Difference

 

0.12**

0.07**

0.10**

   

Z statistic

 

-5.94

-5.89

-6.33

1.01

1.06

1.07

Retinopathy (No)

252

0.78

0.82

0.76

   

Retinopathy (Yes)

51

0.69

0.76

0.69

   

Difference

 

0.09*

0.06*

0.07**

   

Z statistic

 

-2.16

-2.07

-2.68

1.04

1.24

1.29

Nephropathy (No)

278

0.77

0.82

0.75

   

Nephropathy (Yes)

25

0.67

0.75

0.68

   

Difference

 

0.10*

0.07**

0.07**

   

Z statistic

 

-2.57

-2.70

-2.75

0.95

1.07

1.02

Cardiovascular (No)

259

0.78

0.83

0.76

   

Cardiovascular Yes)

44

0.65

0.73

0.66

   

Difference

 

0.13**

0.10**

0.10**

   

Z statistic

 

-3.48

-3.45

-3.60

1.01

1.03

1.04

  1. Note: Data in the columns of UK, US, and Japan are mean EQ-5D index scores. The differences in the scores between groups were tested by Mann-Whitney U tests.
  2. * p-value < 0.05, **p-value < 0.01
  3. a Ratio of Z statistics for UK weights & US weights
  4. b Ratio of Z statistics for Japan weights & UK weights
  5. c Ratio of Z statistics for Japan weights & US weights