Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the prevalence of oral impacts, by OHIP-14 and CS-OIDP attributed to malocclusion, between adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment.

From: Comparison of the discriminative ability of a generic and a condition-specific OHRQoL measure in adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment

  

Prevalence

   

OHRQoL

measure

Normative

need

n

%

PR*

95% CI

for PR

p

value

OHIP-14

No need by IOTN

21

13.3

1.00

  
 

Need by IOTN

6

14.3

1.12

(0.50; 2.49)

0.790

 

No need by DAI

21

12.0

1.00

  
 

Need by DAI

6

24.0

1.64

(0.76; 3.55)

0.211

CS-OIDP

No need by IOTN

29

18.4

1.00

  
 

Need by IOTN

14

33.3

1.89

(1.12; 3.20)

0.017

 

No need by DAI

33

18.9

1.00

  
 

Need by DAI

10

40.0

1.84

(1.00; 3.39)

0.049

  1. * Poisson regression was used to calculate prevalence ratios (PR) adjusted for sex, age, ethnicity and orthodontic treatment status.