Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analyses for angina (Angina Frequency Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), functioning (Exertional Capacity Scale and Social Function), coping (Confrontive coping, Normalising Optimistic coping, Combined Emotive coping scales), perceived burden, general health and overall quality of life.

From: Associations between disease severity, coping and dimensions of health-related quality of life in patients admitted for elective coronary angiography – a cross sectional study

 

AFSa

HADS-Ab

HADS-Dc

ECSd

SFe

Cof

Nof

Cef

Burdeng

GHh

QOLi

CADq

-9.49;**

-0.36

0.47

-0.50

-1.13

0.42

-0.49

-0.16

0.16

1.74

0.08

AFSa

   

0.23; ***

0.14; ***

-0.03

-0.06;°

-0.02

0.02; ***

0.03

-0.00

HADS-A b

   

-0.22

-1.91; ***

1.32; ***

0.79; **

1.75; ***

-0.07; ***

-0.59;*

0.06; ***

HADS-D c

   

-1.09; ***

-2.42; ***

-0.38

-1.41; ***

1.40; ***

-0.00

-0.74; *

0.06; **

CCS j

   

***

    

***

  

   I vs. 0

   

-3.16

-0.04

1.99

0.89

-0.56

-0.37; **

-2.23

-0.19

   II vs. 0

   

-2.48

3.36

-0.72

0.08

0.88

-0.55; ***

-2.77

-0.21;°

   III vs. 0

   

-9.09; ***

0.42

-0.58

2.60

2.72

-0.50; **

-1.52

-0.24

NYHA k

   

***

*

      

   II vs. 0–I

   

-3.55; **

-1.16

-0.40

0.95

-0.41

0.16

-1.70

0.08

   III-IV vs. 0–I

   

-8,01; ***

-8.17; ***

-2.40

-3.64

1.44

0.11

-4.75;°

0.03

ECSd

     

-0.07

-0.12; *

-0,00

0.02; ***

0.23; ***

0.00

SF e

     

-0.05

0.01

-0.11; ***

0.00; *

0.11; **

-0.01; ***

Cof

        

0.01; *

0.07;°

-0.01; *

Nof

        

-0.01; **

-0.03;

-0.00

Cef

        

-0.01°

-0.10;°

0.01;°

Burdeng

          

***

   5 vs. 6

         

-1.19

-0.29

   4 vs. 6

         

-0.07

-0.52; **

   3 vs. 6

         

0.62

-0.54; **

   2 vs. 6

         

2.56

-0.64; **

   1 vs. 6

         

3.04

-1.14; ***

Adjusted R2

0.05

0.12

0.06

0.42

0.39

0.15

0.09

0.51

0.48

0.39

0.43

Interactions t

0.87

0.30

0.37

0.19

0.067

0.37

0.75

0.023

0.38

0.30

0.44

  1. Analyses adjusted for gender, age, education, cohabitation, smoking, body mass index (BMI), diabetes and co morbidity. Regression coefficients; p-values are presented.
  2. q CAD: Coronary artery disease vs no CAD (after angiography)
  3. a AFS: Angina Frequency Scale (Seattle Angina Questionnaire), scale score 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
  4. b HADS-A: Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), scale score 0 (best) to 21 (worst).
  5. c HADS-D: Depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), scale score 0 (best) to 21 (worst).
  6. d ECS: Exertional Capacity Scale (Seattle Angina Questionnaire), scale scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
  7. e SF: Social Function (SF-36), scale scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
  8. f Co: Confrontive coping, No: Normalising Optimistic and Ce: Combined Emotive coping. The three dimensions in Wahl et al's model [33] of the Jalowiec Coping Scale [32]
  9. g Burden: Perceived Burden- perception of living with angina pectoris, 1 (worst) to 6 (best).
  10. h GH: General Health (SF-36), scale scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
  11. i QOL: Overall quality of life, 1 (best) to 7 (worst).
  12. j CCS: Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification, 0 (no angina) to IV (worst, not present in our data).
  13. k NYHA: New York Hear Association Dyspnoea Classification, 0 (no dyspnoea) to IV (worst). 0 and I, and III and IV, collapsed in our data due to small numbers.
  14. t All two-way interactions, overall p-value. Feasible after a few simplifications if necessary.
  15. °p ≤ 0.10; * p ≤ .05. ** p ≤ .01. *** p ≤ .001