| Screener to Baseline * | Baseline to 6 weeks | Baseline to 3 months | Baseline to 9 months |
---|
CESD | 8.75 | 10.48 | 11.65 | 13.67 |
MCS | 9.49 | 10.83 | 11.77 | 13.06 |
MHI5 | 17.18 | 19.08 | 20.55 | 23.45 |
Do Less:Emotional | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.56 |
PCS | 7.74 | 8.02 | 8.77 | 9.69 |
Do Less:Physical | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.55 |
EVGGFP | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.81 |
QLDS | Â | 6.11 | 6.41 | 7.40 |
QOL:Rate | Â | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.91 |
WQ:Environment | Â | 1.78 | 2.00 | 2.15 |
WQ:Physical | Â | 2.25 | 2.55 | 2.86 |
WQ:Psychological | Â | 2.17 | 2.42 | 2.78 |
WQ:Social Relationships | Â | 2.92 | 3.16 | 3.38 |
- * The standard deviation of the difference between the screening value and the baseline value 14 days later is for persons whose screening value was 16 or higher. The last 6 instruments were not used in the screening population.
- The information in Appendix Table 1 should be useful to others in planning future studies of clinically depressed persons. For example, a study might be designed to affect the change in QOL over 3 months as measured by the QLDS. The 3-month change-score had standard deviation 6.41. To detect a difference of, say, 2 points between a treatment and control group with 80% power, the necessary sample size is (1.96+.84)2 * 2 * 6.412 /22 = 161 persons per treatment group. The effect size or responsiveness of an instrument can be calculated from this information as well [29]. Finally the test-retest reliability of the instrument for a population with one CESD score above 16 and a positive CIDI assessment may be approximated from the screener-to-baseline information.