Basic Study Characteristics | Name of Cooperative Group/s leading the study (if any) |
Study location | |
Industry support | |
Primary endpoint/s | |
Difference between treatment arms in the primary endpoint (if any) | |
Age of patients | |
Gender of patients | |
Disease stage | |
Overall trial sample size | |
PRO sample size | |
PRO instrument/s used | |
Summary of PRO results | |
If statistically significant PRO difference exists, details of the domain/s of interest should be reported (e.g. symptoms only, functional aspects, global quality of life) | |
Summary of main clinical (other than PRO) results | |
PRO Methodology and Analysis | PRO identification in the abstract |
Statement of PRO hypothesis and its PRO domain | |
Description of the mode of administration of the PRO tool and the methods of collecting data | |
Electronic mode of PRO administration | |
Description of the rationale for choice of the PRO instrument | |
Citation of evidence of PRO instrument validity and reliability | |
Description of the intended PRO data collection | |
Statement of the status of PRO as either a primary or secondary outcome | |
Statement of the magnitude of the effect size (for statistically significant PRO results) | |
Description of statistical approaches for dealing with missing data | |
Statement of the extent of missing data | |
Flow diagram or description of the allocation of participants and those lost to follow-up for PROs specifically | |
Statement of the reasons for missing data | |
Description of the study patients’ characteristics including baseline PRO scores | |
Reporting of PRO outcomes in a graphical format | |
Discussion of the limitations of the PRO components of the trial | |
Discussion of the limitations of the clinical significance of the PRO findings | |
Methodology used to assess clinical significance | |
Discussion of the PRO results in the context of the other clinical trial outcomes | |
Study Validity | Selection bias |
Performance bias | |
Detection bias | |
Attrition bias | |
Reporting bias |