From: Patient reports of the outcomes of treatment: a structured review of approaches
Type of approach | Title | Description | Comments on psychometric properties |
---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction with/assessment of the outcomes of treatment | Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). [5] | An 8 item measure of patient satisfaction with diabetes treatment. | Developed by qualitative work to ensure comprehensive and authentic issues were covered. Assessed psychometrically and analysed in relation to covariates. |
DTSQc [6] | Revised version of the above. | Detects greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ. | |
Oxford Elbow Score (OES) [7] | A 12-item PRO developed to assess the outcomes of elbow surgery. | Shown to be valid, reliable and sensitive to change after rigorous testing. | |
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. [8] | A 12-item PRO for patients having shoulder operations. | A short, practical, reliable, valid outcome measure that is sensitive to clinically important changes. | |
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. [9] | A 12-item PRO for patients having total hip replacement (THR). | As above. | |
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. [10] | A 12-item questionnaire for patients having a total knee replacement (TKR). | As above. | |
Measures containing transition items/global ratings of change | The Evaluation Ranking Scale (ERS) [11] | The ERS asks patients to rank and then rate six dimensions or characteristics of the services they have received. | Compared with a global measure of satisfaction the ERS was more specific, more discriminating, and resulted in lower satisfaction scores [11]. |
Patient Judgements of Hospital Quality (PJHQ) [12] | Designed to assess the health change associated with hospital stay/treatment over 11 scales. | This measure was subject to extensive and rigorous devolvement and testing that included patient reported open-ended responses about the quality of hospital care, and interviews with hospital administrators, physicians and nurses [12]. | |
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC) [13] | Measures patient evaluations of their health change in relation to treatment. | Captures what patients consider to be important changes in pain ratings [14] and cancer specific quality of life scores [15, 16]. Also a potential correlate of clinical opinion [17]. Used in trials of chronic pain [17, 18] and recommended as a core outcome measure of global improvement [19]. | |
The Functional Status Index (FSI) [20] | A patient specific measure of change in maximal physical, mental, and emotional function with a transition component that measures change from patient specific norms. | As part of the development it was compared with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) [21] and performed well, showing sensitivity to change over time [22]. | |
The Health Transition Index (HTI) [23] | Patient rated change in health between two time periods using a 5 point ordinal scale (1 = much better than a year ago; 2 = somewhat better than a year ago; 3 = about the same; 4 = somewhat worse than a year ago; and 5 = much worse than a year ago) | HTI was used as an external anchor to assess the responsiveness of the SF36 [23], the HAQ [24] and a disease specific health status measure AIMS2 [25] in psoriatic arthritis [26] and detected as much change as clinical examination [26]. | |
Short Form 36 (SF36) [23] | The SF-36 is a health survey with 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health. The HTQs have five response categories from “much better” to “much worse”. | The HTQ was assessed among a large general practice sample and correlated well with change measured prospectively [27]. The discriminative properties of the HTQs were demonstrated in a similar large population study against prospective change [28]. This study was able to successfully distinguish groups whose health had improved compared to those whose health deteriorated. |