Table 4 Scale responsiveness: comparison of mean scores in the ECOHIS-Child, P-CPQ-16, P-CPQ-8, ECOHIS-Family and FIS-8 at baseline and follow-up in the Auckland sample, with effect sizes (N = 157)
From: Comparison of the ECOHIS and short-form P-CPQ and FIS scales
Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean score (sd) | Range (number scoring 0) | Mean score (sd) | Range (number scoring 0) | Mean change score (sd) | Effect size | Effect size description | |
Child measures | |||||||
ECOHIS-child | 7.7 (5.6) | 0-28 (11) | 2.6 (3.2)a | 0-16 (52) | 5.2 (5.7) | 0.9 | Large |
P-CPQ-16 | 15.7 (9.9) | 0-50 (3) | 4.4 (5.6)a | 0-30 (43) | 11.4 (9.9) | 1.2 | Large |
P-CPQ-8 | 9.0 (5.5) | 0-26 (3) | 2.9 (3.2)a | 0-12 (47) | 6.1 (5.5) | 1.1 | Large |
Family measures | |||||||
ECOHIS-family | 3.8 (3.2) | 0-14 (26) | 1.8 (2.1)a | 0-10 (61) | 2.0 (3.2) | 0.6 | Moderate |
FIS-8 | 6.6 (5.6) | 0-25 (18) | 3.0 (3.7)a | 0-17 (88) | 3.6 (5.4) | 0.6 | Moderate |