Skip to main content

Table 4 Scale responsiveness: comparison of mean scores in the ECOHIS-Child, P-CPQ-16, P-CPQ-8, ECOHIS-Family and FIS-8 at baseline and follow-up in the Auckland sample, with effect sizes (N = 157)

From: Comparison of the ECOHIS and short-form P-CPQ and FIS scales

  Pre-treatment Post-treatment    
  Mean score (sd) Range (number scoring 0) Mean score (sd) Range (number scoring 0) Mean change score (sd) Effect size Effect size description
Child measures        
ECOHIS-child 7.7 (5.6) 0-28 (11) 2.6 (3.2)a 0-16 (52) 5.2 (5.7) 0.9 Large
P-CPQ-16 15.7 (9.9) 0-50 (3) 4.4 (5.6)a 0-30 (43) 11.4 (9.9) 1.2 Large
P-CPQ-8 9.0 (5.5) 0-26 (3) 2.9 (3.2)a 0-12 (47) 6.1 (5.5) 1.1 Large
Family measures        
ECOHIS-family 3.8 (3.2) 0-14 (26) 1.8 (2.1)a 0-10 (61) 2.0 (3.2) 0.6 Moderate
FIS-8 6.6 (5.6) 0-25 (18) 3.0 (3.7)a 0-17 (88) 3.6 (5.4) 0.6 Moderate
  1. aDifference between baseline and follow-up scores significant at P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon paired test.