Skip to main content

Table 5 Distribution of the QUALIDEM subscales for people with mild to severe and very severe dementia

From: Scalability and internal consistency of the German version of the dementia-specific quality of life instrument QUALIDEM in nursing homes – a secondary data analysis

Subscales, 0-100 a

  

N

No. of Items

Mean (SD)

Percentiles

      

10%

25%

50%

75%

90%

A

Care relationship

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

75.1 (± 21.4)

43

62

81

95

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

7

74.7 (± 22.3)

38

62

81

93

100

  

81 – 90

205

 

75.4 (± 20.4)

48

62

81

90

100

  

> 90

96

 

74.7 (± 22.8)

41

57

81

95

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

75.9 (± 21.0)

47

62

81

95

100

  

Male

81

 

71.8 (± 22.4)

35

57

76

90

100

 

Very severe

 

256

 

75.2 (± 23.3)

44

56

78

100

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

69

 

68.9 (± 25.5)

33

56

67

89

100

  

81 – 90

129

3

76.6 (± 22.8)

44

56

78

100

100

  

> 90

58

 

79.7 (± 20.2)

54

67

78

100

100

 

Gender

Female

199

 

76.5 (± 22.7)

44

67

78

100

100

  

Male

57

 

70.6 (± 24.8)

33

56

67

94

100

B.

Positive Affect

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

73.1 (± 23.5)

39

56

75

94

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

70.3 (± 24.5)

33

53

72

94

100

  

81 – 90

205

6

74.7 (± 23.2)

39

61

78

97

100

  

> 90

96

 

72.0 (± 23.2)

39

56

75

94

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

74.7 (± 22.6)

29

44

72

89

100

  

Male

81

 

67.4 (± 25.7)

39

61

78

94

100

 

Very severe

 

256

 

64.2 (± 27.5)

25

50

67

90

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

69

 

62.7 (± 28.9)

25

42

67

92

100

  

81 – 90

129

4

63.7 (± 27.2)

17

50

67

83

100

  

> 90

58

 

67.2 (± 26.7)

25

50

75

92

100

 

Gender

Female

199

 

65.1 (± 27.0)

25

50

67

92

100

  

Male

57

 

61.3 (± 29.3)

17

38

67

88

100

C.

Negative Affect

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

71.4 (± 23.5)

44

56

78

89

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

72.2 (± 24.4)

33

56

78

89

100

  

81 – 90

205

3

70.7 (± 23.7)

44

56

78

89

100

  

> 90

96

 

72.3 (± 22.7)

44

56

78

89

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

69.1 (± 24.3)

33

56

67

89

100

  

Male

81

 

80.0 (± 18.0)

56

67

89

89

100

 

Very severeb

 

256

 

69.4 (± 27.7)

33

50

67

100

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

69

 

67.6 (± 29.4)

17

50

83

100

100

  

81 – 90

129

2

68.0 (± 27.5)

17

50

67

100

100

  

> 90

58

 

74.7 (± 25.8)

33

50

83

100

100

 

Gender

Female

199

 

66.8 (± 28.0)

17

50

67

100

100

  

Male

57

 

78.4 (± 24.8)

33

67

83

100

100

D.

Restless tense behavior

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

66.6 (± 29.4)

22

44

67

89

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

66.5 (± 33.3)

11

33

78

100

100

  

81 – 90

205

3

66.6 (± 29.0)

22

44

67

89

100

  

> 90

96

 

66.9 (± 27.0)

33

44

67

89

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

66.6 (± 29.6)

22

44

67

89

100

  

Male

81

 

66.8 (± 28.8)

22

44

78

89

100

 

Very severe

 

256

 

55.9 (± 29.4)

11

33

56

78

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

69

 

49.4 (± 30.7)

0

22

56

67

100

  

81 – 90

129

3

56.8 (± 29.3)

11

33

56

78

100

  

> 90

58

 

61.7 (± 27.2)

22

33

67

81

100

 

Gender

Female

199

 

57.4 (± 29.3)

11

33

56

78

100

  

Male

57

 

50.9 (± 29.5)

11

22

56

78

89

E.

Positive self-image

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

77.6 (± 25.7)

44

67

89

100

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

78.5 (± 25.6)

33

67

89

100

100

  

81 – 90

205

3

76.9 (± 26.1)

40

67

89

100

100

  

> 90

96

 

78.6 (± 25.1)

44

67

89

100

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

77.0 (± 25.9)

44

67

89

100

100

  

Male

81

 

80.0 (± 24.8)

33

67

89

100

100

F.

Social relations

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

64.7 (± 21.4)

33

50

67

83

89

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

63.6 (± 24.5)

32

44

67

83

94

  

81 – 90

205

6

66.2 (± 20.5)

39

50

67

83

94

  

> 90

96

 

62.3 (± 20.7)

33

44

67

78

89

 

Gender

Female

297

 

66.6 (± 20.5)

39

50

67

83

94

  

Male

81

 

57.4 (± 23.3)

23

44

61

75

89

 

Very severeb

 

256

 

66.3 (± 25.7)

22

47

67

89

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

69

 

64.9 (± 25.6)

22

44

67

89

100

  

81 – 90

129

3

64.9 (± 26.3)

22

56

67

89

100

  

> 90

58

 

70.9 (± 24.3)

33

56

78

89

100

 

Gender

Female

199

 

67.2 (± 24.8)

33

56

67

89

100

  

Male

57

 

63.2 (± 28.6)

22

44

67

89

100

G.

Social isolation

         
 

Mild to severeb

 

378

 

73.7 (± 25.0)

33

56

78

100

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

79.2 (± 22.8)

44

61

89

100

100

  

81 – 90

205

3

72.2 (± 25.5)

33

56

78

100

100

  

> 90

96

 

72.2 (± 24.9)

33

56

78

89

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

73.4 (± 25.5)

33

56

78

100

100

  

Male

81

 

74.5 (± 22.7)

44

56

78

100

100

 

Very severeb

 

256

 

75.4 (± 23.3)

41

67

78

100

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

69

 

71.5 (± 24.1)

33

56

67

100

100

  

81 – 90

129

3

77.9 (± 22.5)

44

67

78

100

100

  

> 90

58

 

74.5 (± 23.7)

33

67

78

100

100

 

Gender

Female

199

 

74.9 (± 23.4)

44

67

78

100

100

  

Male

57

 

77.2 (± 23.1)

33

61

89

100

100

H.

Feeling at home

         
 

Mild to severe

 

378

 

78.0 (± 21.6)

42

67

83

100

100

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

78.0 (± 22.7)

42

67

83

100

100

  

81 – 90

205

4

76.5 (± 22.2)

42

67

83

92

100

  

> 90

96

 

81.2 (± 19.2)

50

67

92

100

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

79.0 (± 21.1)

50

67

83

100

100

  

Male

81

 

74.5 (± 22.7)

42

58

75

92

100

I

Having something to do

         
 

Mild to severeb

 

378

 

40.4 (± 29.5)

0

17

50

50

83

 

Age, years

≤ 80

77

 

44.2 (± 31.3)

0

17

50

67

100

  

81 – 90

205

2

40.8 (± 29.3)

33

56

72

89

100

  

> 90

96

 

36.6 (± 28.2)

33

56

78

100

100

 

Gender

Female

297

 

42.5 (± 29.9)

0

17

50

67

83

  

Male

81

 

32.9 (± 26.6)

0

0

33

50

67

  1. aSubscale sum scores were transformed to values between 0 and 100 using the formula: QUALIDEM(%) = QUALIDEM(Sumscore)*100/3*N(number of items for each subscale). Higher scores indicate a higher Qol.
  2. bNot scalable and unreliable subscale.