Table 2 Multivariable linear regression analyses of the association between abortion complications and EQ-5D utility score
Variable | Model 1: no interaction terms | Model 2: with interaction terms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Difference in mean EQ-5D utility Score †,* | 95% CI | p-value | Difference in mean EQ-5D utility Score †,** | 95% CI | p-value | |
Abortion Complications (versus Routine Obstetric Care) | −0.12 | −0.18, -0.07 | <0.001 | −0.25 | −0.47, -0.02 | 0.031 |
Age (years) | 0.00 | −0.01, 0.01 | 0.620 | 0.00 | −0.01, 0.01 | 0.705 |
Social Support Number Score | 0.02 | −0.02, 0.05 | 0.389 | 0.07 | 0.01, 0.12 | 0.017 |
Social Support Satisfaction Score | 0.03 | 0.00, 0.05 | 0.026 | 0.06 | 0.02, 0.10 | 0.007 |
Number of Children | 0.00 | −0.02, 0.01 | 0.687 | −0.00 | −0.02, 0.02 | 0.950 |
Marital status (versus Currently married) | ||||||
Never married | 0.00 | −0.06, 0.07 | 0.919 | 0.01 | −0.05, 0.08 | 0.735 |
Separated/divorced | −0.09 | −0.17, 0.00 | 0.053 | −0.01 | −0.19, -0.10 | 0.029 |
Widowed | 0.15 | −0.12, 0.41 | 0.272 | 0.13 | −0.13, 0.39 | 0.313 |
Self-reported HIV status (versus Negative) | ||||||
Positive | −0.03 | −0.11, 0.05 | 0.501 | −0.02 | −0.10, 0.06 | 0.588 |
Don’t know | −0.02 | −0.08, 0.04 | 0.464 | −0.02 | −0.08, 0.04 | 0.511 |
Employment status (versus Not working or Subsistence worker) | ||||||
For money, Part-time | −0.11 | −0.18, -0.04 | 0.004 | −0.11 | −0.18, -0.03 | 0.005 |
For money, Fulltime | −0.05 | −0.13, 0.03 | 0.194 | −0.04 | −0.12, 0.04 | 0.288 |
Socioeconomic Index summary (versus Lowest tertile) | ||||||
Middle tertile | −0.06 | −0.13, 0.00 | 0.048 | −0.05 | −0.11, 0.01 | 0.118 |
Highest tertile | 0.00 | −0.06, 0.06 | 0.980 | −0.00 | −0.06, 0.06 | 0.981 |
Abortion Complications * SSQN score | −0.09 | −0.15, -0.05 | 0.018 | |||
Abortion Complications * SSQS score | 0.05 | 0.00, 0.10 | 0.043 | |||
F(14, 91) = 3.68, p = 0.0001 | F(14, 89) = 3.81, p < 0.001 | |||||