Open Access

Improvement of health-related quality of life in depression after transcranial magnetic stimulation in a naturalistic trial is associated with decreased perfusion in precuneus

  • Rémy Dumas1, 2Email author,
  • Raphaëlle Richieri1, 2, 5,
  • Eric Guedj3, 4, 5,
  • Pascal Auquier2, 6,
  • Christophe Lancon1, 2 and
  • Laurent Boyer2, 6
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes201210:87

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-87

Received: 19 March 2012

Accepted: 16 July 2012

Published: 28 July 2012



Assessing Health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) is necessary to evaluate care and treatments provided to patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), in addition to the traditional assessment of clinical outcomes. However, HRQoL remains under-utilized to assess the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in research or in a routine clinical setting. The primary objective of this exploratory study on MDD was to investigate the impact of low-frequency rTMS on HRQoL using the SF-36 questionnaire. A secondary objective was to study the functional neural substrate underlying HRQoL changes using neuroimaging.


Fifteen right-handed patients who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD participated in the study. HRQoL was assessed using the SF-36, and regional cerebral blood (rCBF) flow using 99mTc-ECD-SPECT. Voxel based correlation was searched between concomitant changes in rCBF and in HRQoL after rTMS.


Role-Physical Problems dimension showed a statistical significant improvement of 73.2% (p = 0.001) and an effect size (Cohen’s d) of 0.43, indicating moderate effect. Five SF-36 dimension scores and the two composite scores showed effect sizes ranged from 0.28 to 0.43. Improvement of Mental Composite Score (MCS)-SF-36 after rTMS was correlated with a concomitant decrease of precuneus perfusion (p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses confirmed that decreased perfusion in precuneus was correlated with improvement of HRQoL, especially for MCS (r = −0.71; p < 0.001), Mental Health (r = −0.81; p < 0.001) and Social Functioning (r = −0.57; p = 0.026) dimensions.


This study suggests low-frequency rTMS can improve HRQoL, through its role-physical problems dimension, in patients with MDD. This improvement is associated with a decreased perfusion of the precuneus, a brain area involved in self-focus and self-processing, arguing for a neural substrate to the impact of rTMS on HRQoL.


Depression Health-related quality of life Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) Precuneus


Major depressive disorder (MDD) [1] remains one of the leading causes of disability in developed countries despite pharmacological and psychological treatments [2]. A new alternative for depressed individuals is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive well-tolerated technique [35]. rTMS protocols have been developed using high-frequency stimulation (> 5 Hz) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or low-frequency (< 1 Hz) of the right DLPFC. The choice of distinct frequency comes from electrophysiological data of the motor cortex, showing that high-frequencies may have an excitatory effect while low-frequencies tend to suppress cortical excitability [6, 7]. Effectiveness of rTMS has been investigated in most studies using clinical outcomes, such as change in depressive symptomatology [8, 9]. Thereby, meta-analyses have highlighted a threshold of 50% decrease in symptom severity, in up to 76% of patients [1012]. Interestingly, the efficiency of low-frequency rTMS stimulation of the right DLPFC and of high-frequency rTMS stimulation of the left DLPFC seems to be similar in depressed patients [11, 13, 14].

On the other hand, Health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires are considered valuable and necessary tools to evaluate care and treatments provided to patients with MDD, in addition to the traditional assessment of clinical outcomes [1517]. HRQoL may add interesting information that is oriented toward a more global service to individuals including the subjective experience of their illness, with regard to their symptoms but also their functioning embedded in social and environmental context [15]. However, HRQoL remains under-utilized to assess the effectiveness of rTMS in research or in a routine clinical setting [8], and more globally in psychiatric clinical practice [18, 19]. In congruence with prior investigations on HRQoL in MDD following antidepressant pharmacotherapy [20, 21], only two recent studies, using the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Measure , brief version (WHOQOL BREF) [22] and the Medical Outcome Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) [23, 24] questionnaires, have shown improvement in HRQoL domains following high-frequency rTMS [8, 25]. These important findings should be confirmed using low-frequency rTMS which is better tolerated than high-frequency rTMS in terms of seizure risk [26].

The primary objective of this exploratory study was to investigate the impact of low-frequency rTMS on HRQoL using the SF-36 questionnaire, in patients with MDD. In addition, a better understanding of the mechanism underlying HRQoL changes is of particular interest in depression, as already proposed in schizophrenia [27, 28]. A secondary objective was thus to study the functional neural substrate underlying HRQoL changes using neuroimaging with 99 m Tc-ethyl cysteinate dimer single-photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-ECD-SPECT), a valuable tool to investigate the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), in a range of psychiatric disorders such as depression [2931].



Fifteen right-handed patients, who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD participated in the study [1]. Inclusion criteria were: unipolar depression, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score ≥ 20 [32], non-response to pharmacological treatment using a minimum of two distinctly different classes of antidepressant medications for episodes occurring at the time of enrolment, and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were based on the following criteria: age under 18 years, MDD with psychotic features, psychiatric diagnosis other than MDD on Axis I of DSM-IV-TR [1], neurological disorders or convulsive disorders, and previous rTMS or electroconvulsive therapy treatments. Pretreatment with an antidepressant and/or mood stabilizer medication had to be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to entry in the study and remain unchanged throughout. The local Ethics Committee, Marseille, France approved the investigations. The project was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and French Good Clinical Practice [33, 34].

rTMS treatment

Low-frequency magnetic stimulation was performed using a figure eight-shaped water-cooled coil (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) to the right DLPFC. At the first rTMS session, the motor threshold was defined as the minimum intensity leading to the most prominent abduction of the left abductor pollicis brevis muscle after stimulation of the right motor cortex. This movement was determined by an electromyogram recording. During the treatment, the coil was positioned 5 cm anterior and in a parasagittal line from the motor cortex. rTMS was delivered with following characteristics: six 60-s trains at 1 Hz and at 120% of the motor threshold were applied in each session with a 30-s interval between the trains. Twenty treatment sessions were administered during 4 weeks (total pulses, 7200) [11].

Data collection

The following data were recorded: (1) demographic characteristics: gender and age, marital status and education level; (2) handedness determined by the Edinburgh Inventory [35]; (3) clinical characteristics: duration of illness, episode duration; (4) depression severity was assessed using the 21-item self-report Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) [32]. A score from 0 to 63 is calculated, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms; (5) HRQoL was assessed using the SF-36 [23, 24]. SF-36 is a generic, self-administered, and worldwide-used questionnaire consisting of 36 items describing 8 dimensions: Physical Functioning (PF), Social Functioning (SF), Role-Physical Problems (RPP), Role-Emotional Problems (REP), Mental Health (MH), Vitality (VIT), Bodily Pain (BP), and General Health (GH). Each dimension is scored within a range of 0 (low HRQoL level) to 100 (high HRQoL level). Two component summary measures of SF-36, namely physical and mental composite scores (PCS-SF-36 and MCS-SF-36) are calculated.

Depression severity and HRQoL were assessed at baseline (t0), and at the end of rTMS (t1).

SPECT protocol and analysis

Brain SPECT was performed in all patients, with the same camera, and under the same conditions, as previously described [29]. This exam was performed during the week before rTMS, and a second SPECT scan was obtained during the week after the end of the rTMS treatment. A voxel-by-voxel group study was then performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 8 (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, University College, London), running on Matlab (MathworksInc, Sherborn, MA).

Images were initially converted from the DICOM to the Analyze format using MRIcro (, and transferred to SPM8. Data were then standardized with the Montreal Neurological Institute atlas, using a 12-parameter affine transformation, followed by non-linear transformations and trilinear interpolation. Dimensions of resulting voxels were 2x2x2 mm. Standardized data were then smoothed with a Gaussian filter (FWHM = 12 mm), to blur individual variations in gyral anatomy, and to increase signal-to-noise ratio. The “proportional scaling” routine was used to control for individual variation in global brain perfusion.

Voxel based correlation was searched between concomitant changes in rCBF and in HRQoL after rTMS (PCS- and MCS-SF-36 changes). For this, brain SPECT, PCS and MCS baseline scores were subtracted with their respective post rTMS scores, and then divided by their respective baseline scores. The SPM (T) maps were obtained at a height threshold of p < 0.001 (uncorrected) for the voxel, with at least 24 voxels within each cluster (forth FWHM of the Gaussian filter).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed in proportion or mean and standard deviation (SD). Pre-post rTMS HRQoL comparisons were analyzed using two-tailed paired t-tests. Cohen's d effect sizes were then calculated [8, 36]. As recommended, we considered d values from 0.15 to 0.39, 0.4 to 0.74 and from 0.74 to 1.1 as indicating small, moderate and large effect sizes, respectively [8, 36]. Associations were then looked for between cluster(s) previously found correlated with PCS- and/or MCS-SF-36, and changes in dimensions of SF-36 and BDI-II, using Spearman’s correlation tests. Spearman’s correlation tests were used to determine the relationship between changes in BDI-II score and changes in dimensions and scores of SF-36. All the tests were two-sided. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 17.0 software package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).


Patient characteristics

The fifteen subjects (twelve women) presented pharmacoresistant unipolar depression with high severity (BDI-II = 36; SD = 9.8). The average patient age was 49.8 years (SD = 10.5), the duration of illness was 14.4 years (SD = 10.1), and the duration of current depressive episode was 38.2 months (SD = 35.1). Twelve patients were single or divorced; ten patients had a high school or college education. Most patients (n = 13) received rTMS as add-on treatment, and were treated under antidepressant monotherapy (n = 10), or combination of antidepressant and mood stabilizer (n = 3). Nine patients took benzodiazepines or hypnotics during rTMS treatment. Two patients were totally medication-free.

Quality of life

PCS showed improvement of 5.1%, MCS of 13.9%, and BDI-II of 13.1%. Role-Physical Problems dimension showed a statistically significant improvement of 73.2% (p = 0.001) and an effect size (Cohen’s d) of 0.43, indicating moderate effect. General Health dimension remained fairly constant (2% increase), although the other dimensions increased from 11 (Social functioning) to 100% (Role-Emotional Problems). Five SF-36 dimension scores (Physical Functioning, Role-Emotional Problems, Mental Health, Bodily Pain, Vitality) and the two composite scores showed small to moderate effect sizes (Table 1 ). Significant correlations between BDI-II changes and HRQoL were found for the following dimensions: MCS (r = −0.71; p = 0.003), MH (r = −0.65; p = 0.009), SF (r = −0.58; p = 0.023), VIT (r = −0.75; p = 0.001), PF (r = −0.56; p = 0.03) and GH (r = −0.52; p = 0.04).
Table 1

Pre-post rTMS HRQoL comparisons (n = 15)




P value

Effect size (ES)


Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)


(Cohen's d)


53.3 (25.4)

62.0 (28.5)


+ 0.32 a


18.3 (30.6)

31.7 (32.0)


+ 0.43 b


19.3 (15.1)

25.0 (17.1)


+ 0.35 a


40.9 (21.2)

49.9 (28.7)


+ 0.36 a


25.6 (12.0)

32.8 (22.8)


+ 0.39 a


13.3 (24.6)

26.7 (36.1)


+ 0.43 b


29.2 (21.0)

32.5 (25.4)


+ 0.14


28.6 (21.1)

29.1 (19.5)


+ 0.02


23.7 (6.8)

27 (12)


+ 0.31 a


38.9 (8.1)

40.9 (9.2)


+ 0.28 a

SF-36—PF Physical Functioning, RPP Role—Physical Problems, VIT Vitality, BP Bodily Pain, MH Mental Health, REP Role—Emotional Problems, SF Social Functioning, GH General Health, MCS Mental Composite Score, PCS Physical Composite Score.

a small effect size; b moderate effect size.

Correlation between brain SPECT perfusion and HRQOL and clinical scores after rTMS

HRQoL improvement for MCS-SF-36 was associated with a decreased perfusion of the precuneus (p < 0.001, uncorrected; T-score = 3.85) (Figure 1). No other significant correlation was found using whole brain analysis, in particular for PCS-SF-36 and for BDI-II.
Figure 1

Anatomical localization of areas of decreased perfusion after rTMS correlated with concomitant HRQoL improvement (p < 0.001, uncorrected; k > 24).

Spearman’s correlations were then looked for between this cluster and the SF-36 dimension and BDI-II scores (Table 2). rCBF decrease of the precuneus was highly correlated with an HRQoL dimension increase of MCS-SF-36 (r = −0.71; p < 0.001), MH (r = −0.81; p < 0.001) and SF (r = −0.57; p = 0.026). On the contrary, precuneus perfusion was not significantly correlated with other SF-36 dimensions or with BDI-II score (p > 0.05).
Table 2

Correlations between changes in rCBF within the precuneus and changes in SF-36 dimensions and BDI-II


Precuneus cluster R#

p values




- 0.25






- 0.10






- 0.81

< 0.001


- 0.37



- 0.57



- 0.10



- 0.71

< 0.001







# R: Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

SF-36—PF Physical Functioning, RPP Role—Physical Problems, VIT Vitality, BP Bodily Pain, MH Mental Health, REP Role—Emotional Problems, SF Social Functioning, GH General Health, MCS Mental Composite Score, PCS Physical Composite Score.

BDI-II. Beck Depression Inventory - II.


Our study provides important information on the impact of rTMS on HRQoL in patients with MDD. Firstly, using a low-frequency rTMS administered on the right DLPFC, our findings tend to confirm the preliminary results of Berlim et al.[8], and Hadley et al.[25] using a high-frequency rTMS on the left DLPFC. Role-Physical Problems dimension improved significantly from baseline and showed moderate effect size. Five SF-36 dimension scores and the two composite scores showed effect sizes higher than 0.28, suggesting a small to moderate “clinically” meaningful improvement of HRQoL. Although the HRQoL increase in our study showed less magnitude on physical, psychological and overall domains (respective Cohen’s d, 0.44, 0.44, 0.57) than those found in Berlim’s study [8] and on physical functioning, vitality, social functioning and mental health dimensions than in Hadley’s study [25], precaution should be taken in this comparison. This difference may be explained by a higher effect of high-frequency rTMS on HRQoL than low-frequency rTMS. However, the study of Berlim et al. did not use the same questionnaire, and the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF appear to measure distinct concepts related to HRQoL [37]. Concerning the study of Hadley et al., the baseline HRQoL levels were significantly higher than in our sample, and differential change in means from baseline may simply be due to skewness interacting with baseline differences [38]. Future studies should thus compare the impact of high and low-frequency rTMS on HRQoL using both questionnaires.

Moreover, this whole-brain voxel-based study is the first to investigate the neural substrate underlying HRQoL changes in patients with MDD treated by rTMS. We show that improvement of HRQoL for social and mental health dimensions SF-36-scores after rTMS is associated with a decreased perfusion of the precuneus. The precuneus has reciprocal connections with the DLPFC [39]. So, the decreased activity of the precuneus can result from the inhibitory effects of low-frequency rTMS over the right DLPFC, which can induce activity changes in distant brain regions via the neural pathways [40].

This report strengthens the scientific conceptual basis of HRQoL. The psychosocial construct of HRQoL, which required accurate self-assessment by individuals of their own inner feelings and state of well-being, appears consistent with precuneus involvement [31]. Indeed, precuneus has been mainly implicated in subjective experience and conscious self-representation [31, 41]. In healthy subjects, precuneus is activated in self-related mental representations: at rest, through the default mode network [39], and during tasks about reflection on one’s own personality traits and physical appearance [42]. Precuneus has been also involved in the subjective well-being and distress of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder [43].

Our findings attempt to provide some clues for a better understanding of the mechanism underlying the relationship between depression and HRQoL found in previous studies [15, 44, 45]. Indeed, patients with depression suffer from an increased self-focus (i.e. link negative affect and episodic memory deficit with an increased attention to the self) [46], and exaggerated self-processing (i.e. the appraisal of stimuli as strongly related to one’s own person) [47]. Exaggerated self-referential processing (SRP) especially distorts interpretations of social cues and maintains social fears because of maladaptive cognitions regarding self (i.e. as socially incompetent) and others (i.e. as critical judges) [48]. Decreased activation in the precuneus could thus reflect a restored deactivation of the default mode network [49]. We hypothesize that decreased rCBF of the precuneus may be associated to a reduction of SRP allowing patients to focus their own attention on their environment, relatives and friends and then explaining an improvement of HRQoL. On the other hand, precuneus has been also involved in the theory of mind (ToM) [50, 51] which is conceived as a set of abilities that enable humans to understand other peoples' mental states and intentions. In particular, ToM is interrelated with self-focus attention and self-emotional awareness [51]. Moreover, previous studies have reported that ToM performance was associated with an increased perfusion of the precuneus [28, 31]. Interestingly, Wolkenstein et al. [52] found that depressed patients were more accurate in decoding negative than neutral and positive mental states. The precuneus hypoperfusion found in our study may reflect a better attention for positive episodes and a decreased emotional response to negative thoughts [43] and thus be associated with improved mental health HRQoL concerning feelings of nervousness, peacefulness, and happiness [28, 31].

Our findings should be considered in treatment of patients with MDD, supporting the use of therapeutic interventions targeting self-focus and SRP, such as mindfulness-based cognitive therapy [53] or cognitive base-therapy, to improve HRQoL. On the other hand, the impact of rTMS applied specifically to precuneus in patients with MDD on HRQoL should be investigated in future studies.

Lastly, the links between precuneus perfusion and HRQoL on the one hand, and those between HRQoL and depression on the other hand, help to better understand the mechanism of action of rTMS. The impact of rTMS may not only relieve the symptoms of MDD, but also affects other relevant psychosocial domains measured by HRQoL, which may in turn influence mood improvement. In accordance with this hypothesis, recent studies have shown HRQoL to be a prognostic factor associated with clinical outcome in various chronic diseases [54, 55]. These findings may provide a support to integrate HRQoL in clinical practice, as complementary information to that traditionally collected in psychiatry.


Several limitations have to be considered in this exploratory study. The first limitation is the small sample size (n = 15); the lack of power may explain the contrast between the non-significant statistical results and the small to moderate level of effect sizes. Second, the absence of control group limits our ability to attribute the HRQoL changes exclusively to rTMS. However, although controlled trials are appropriate for establishing potentially causal associations, more naturalistic studies have the advantage of assessing “real life” situations of patients under treatment. These distinct limitations, also present in the previous reports [8, 25], should be considered in future studies. Third, we used the standard 5-cm localization procedure for applying rTMS over the right DLPFC, instead of using a neuronavigational method, which seems to enhance response to rTMS [56]. Fourth, the unbalanced sample regarding gender might have bias our findings. However, the influence of gender on HRQoL is still unclear [5759], and gender is not associated with difference in rTMS outcomes [60]. Sixth, some patients were receiving medical treatment during the study, including benzodiazepins that modify cortical excitability. Therefore, the effects of these medications on HRQoL and rCBF cannot be excluded. Finally, the use a self-rating subjective scale (BDI-II) to assess the severity of depression could be criticized. However, studies support a satisfactory convergent validity between BDI-II and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or Clinical Global Impression [61, 62].


This study suggests low-frequency rTMS can improve HRQoL, through its role-physical problems dimension, in patients with MDD. This improvement is associated with a decreased perfusion of the precuneus, a brain area involved in self-focus and self-processing, arguing for a neural substrate to the impact of rTMS on HRQoL.



Health-related quality of life


Major depressive disorder


Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder, fourth edition


Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation


Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex


Single-photon emission computed tomography


Regional cerebral blood flow


Statistical parametric mapping


Standard derivation


Physical functioning


Role—Physical Problems




Bodily pain


Mental health


Role—emotional problems


Social functioning


General health


Mental composite score


Physical composite score


Beck depression inventory


Self-referential processing


Theory of Mind.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital
Aix-Marseille Univ, EA 3279 - Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit
Service Central de Biophysique et Médecine Nucléaire, La Timone University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
Aix-Marseille Univ, CERIMED
Aix-Marseille Univ, INT, CNRS UMR 7289
Department of Public Health, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille


  1. American Psychiatric Association: DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edition. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  2. The World Health Report: Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.Google Scholar
  3. George MS, Wassermann EM, Williams WA, Callahan A, Ketter TA, Basser P, Hallett M, Post RM: Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression. Neuroreport 1995, 6: 1853–1856. 10.1097/00001756-199510020-00008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rumi DO, Gattaz WF, Rigonatti SP, Rosa MA, Fregni F, Rosa MO, Mansur C, Myczkowski ML, Moreno RA, Marcolin MA: Transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates the antidepressant effect of amitriptyline in severe depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Biol Psychiatry 2005, 57: 162–166. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lefaucheur J-P, André-Obadia N, Poulet E, Devanne H, Haffen E, Londero A, Cretin B, Leroi A-M, Radtchenko A, Saba G, Thai-Van H, Litré C-F, Vercueil L, Bouhassira D, Ayache S-S, Farhat W-H, Zouari H-G, Mylius V, Nicolier M, Garcia-Larrea L: French guidelines on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): safety and therapeutic indications. Neurophysiol Clin 2011, 41: 221–295. 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.10.062View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, Cohen LG: Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997, 48: 1398–1403. 10.1212/WNL.48.5.1398View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M: Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 1994, 117(Pt 4):847–858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Berlim MT, McGirr A, Beaulieu M-M, Turecki G: High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an augmenting strategy in severe treatment-resistant major depression: a prospective 4-week naturalistic trial. J Affect Disord 2011, 130: 312–317. 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McLoughlin DM: Review: high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves symptoms of major depression. Evid Based Ment Health 2009, 12: 80–81. 10.1136/ebmh.12.3.80View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross M, Nakamura L, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F: Has repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for depression improved? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the recent vs. the earlier rTMS studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2007, 116: 165–173. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01049.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schutter DJLG: Quantitative review of the efficacy of slow-frequency magnetic brain stimulation in major depressive disorder. Psychol Med 2010, 40: 1789–1795. 10.1017/S003329171000005XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Slotema CW, Blom JD, Hoek HW, Sommer IEC: Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 2010, 71: 873–884. 10.4088/JCP.08m04872greView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eche J, Mondino M, Haesebaert F, Saoud M, Poulet E, Brunelin J: Low- vs high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for refractory depression. Front Psychiatry 2012, 3: 13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzgerald PB, Hoy K, Daskalakis ZJ, Kulkarni J: A randomized trial of the anti-depressant effects of low- and high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety 2009, 26: 229–234. 10.1002/da.20454View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Papakostas GI, Petersen T, Mahal Y, Mischoulon D, Nierenberg AA, Fava M: Quality of life assessments in major depressive disorder: a review of the literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004, 26: 13–17. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.07.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Fruyt J, Demyttenaere K: Quality of life measurement in antidepressant trials. Is there an added value? Psychother Psychosom 2009, 78: 212–219. 10.1159/000214442View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy SH, Eisfeld BS, Cooke RG: Quality of life: an important dimension in assessing the treatment of depression? J Psychiatry Neurosci 2001, 26(Suppl):S23–28.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA: Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures. National survey. Br J Psychiatry 2002, 180: 101–103. 10.1192/bjp.180.2.101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R: The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med 2005, 60: 833–843. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Berlim MT, Pargendler J, Brenner J, Fleck MPA: Significant improvement in the quality of life of Brazilian depressed outpatients 12 weeks following the start of antidepressants. Psychiatry Res 2007, 153: 253–259. 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.07.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Demyttenaere K, Andersen HF, Reines EH: Impact of escitalopram treatment on quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire scores in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2008, 23: 276–286. 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328303ac5fView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA: The world health organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004, 13: 299–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leplège A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV: The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51: 1013–1023. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00093-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30: 473–483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hadley D, Anderson BS, Borckardt JJ, Arana A, Li X, Nahas Z, George MS: Safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of high doses of adjunctive daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in a clinical setting. J ECT 2011, 27: 18–25. 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181ce1a8cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Theodore WH, Hunter K, Chen R, Vega-Bermudez F, Boroojerdi B, Reeves-Tyer P, Werhahn K, Kelley KR, Cohen L: Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of seizures: a controlled study. Neurology 2002, 59: 560–562. 10.1212/WNL.59.4.560View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Awad AG, Voruganti LNP: Measuring quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: an update. Pharmacoeconomics 2012, 30: 183–195. 10.2165/11594470-000000000-00000View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Boyer L, Richieri R, Faget C, Padovani R, Vaillant F, Mundler O, Lançon C, Auquier P, Guedj E: Functional involvement of superior temporal sulcus in quality of life of patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2012, 202: 155–160. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Richieri R, Boyer L, Farisse J, Colavolpe C, Mundler O, Lancon C, Guedj E: Predictive value of brain perfusion SPECT for rTMS response in pharmacoresistant depression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011, 38: 1715–1722. 10.1007/s00259-011-1850-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Richieri R, Boyer L, Lançon C, Guedj E: Predict the outcome of depression after rTMS using neuroimaging: Issue of response or non-response? Brain Stimul 2012.Google Scholar
  31. Faget-Agius C, Boyer L, Padovani R, Richieri R, Mundler O, Lançon C, Guedj E: Schizophrenia with preserved insight is associated with increased perfusion of the precuneus. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2012, 37: 110125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W: Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess 1996, 67: 588–597. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. CNIL: Act n°78–17 of 6 January 1978 on Data Processing, Data Files and Individual Liberties (amended by the Act of 6 August 2004 relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data). France: Journal officiel de la République Française. Assemblée Nationale et Sénat; 2004.Google Scholar
  34. World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2000, 284: 3043–3045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9: 97–113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Thalheimer W, Cook S: How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. 2002. August. Retrieved January 2, 2012 from Scholar
  37. Huang I-C, Wu AW, Frangakis C: Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population*. Qual Life Res 2006, 15: 15–24. 10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jamieson J: Dealing with baseline differences: two principles and two dilemmas. Int J Psychophysiol 1999, 31: 155–161. 10.1016/S0167-8760(98)00048-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR: The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 2006, 129: 564–583. 10.1093/brain/awl004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kito S, Hasegawa T, Koga Y: Neuroanatomical correlates of therapeutic efficacy of low-frequency right prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011, 65: 175–182. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02183.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lou HC, Luber B, Crupain M, Keenan JP, Nowak M, Kjaer TW, Sackeim HA, Lisanby SH: Parietal cortex and representation of the mental self. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101: 6827–6832. 10.1073/pnas.0400049101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kjaer TW, Nowak M, Lou HC: Reflective self-awareness and conscious states: PET evidence for a common midline parietofrontal core. Neuroimage 2002, 17: 1080–1086. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1230View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nardo D, Högberg G, Flumeri F, Jacobsson H, Larsson SA, Hällström T, Pagani M: Self-rating scales assessing subjective well-being and distress correlate with rCBF in PTSD-sensitive regions. Psychol Med 2011, 45: 2549–2561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritsner M, Kurs R, Gibel A, Hirschmann S, Shinkarenko E, Ratner Y: Predictors of quality of life in major psychoses: a naturalistic follow-up study. J Clin Psychiatry 2003, 64: 308–315. 10.4088/JCP.v64n0313View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ritsner M, Gibel A, Ratner Y: Determinants of changes in perceived quality of life in the course of schizophrenia. Qual Life Res 2006, 15: 515–526. 10.1007/s11136-005-2808-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mor N, Winquist J: Self-focused attention and negative affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2002, 128: 638–662.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lemogne C, Gorwood P, Bergouignan L, Pélissolo A, Lehéricy S, Fossati P: Negative affectivity, self-referential processing and the cortical midline structures. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2011, 6: 426–433. 10.1093/scan/nsq049PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Bögels SM, Mansell W: Attention processes in the maintenance and treatment of social phobia: hypervigilance, avoidance and self-focused attention. Clin Psychol Rev 2004, 24: 827–856. 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.06.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Delaveau P, Jabourian M, Lemogne C, Guionnet S, Bergouignan L, Fossati P: Brain effects of antidepressants in major depression: a meta-analysis of emotional processing studies. J Affect Disord 2011, 130: 66–74. 10.1016/j.jad.2010.09.032View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Duval C, Desgranges B, Eustache F, Piolino P: Looking at the self under the microscope of cognitive neurosciences: from self-consciousness to consciousness of others. Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 2009, 7: 7–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Saxe R, Moran JM, Scholz J, Gabrieli J: Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2006, 1: 229–234. 10.1093/scan/nsl034PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolkenstein L, Schönenberg M, Schirm E, Hautzinger M: I can see what you feel, but I can’t deal with it: Impaired theory of mind in depression. J Affect Disord 2011, 132: 104–111. 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Goldin P, Ramel W, Gross J: Mindfulness meditation training and self-referential processing in social anxiety disorder: behavioral and neural effects. J Cogn Psychotherapy 2009, 23: 242–257. 10.1891/0889-8391.23.3.242View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Boyer L, Millier A, Perthame E, Aballea S, Auquier P, Toumi M: Quality of life is predictive of relapse in schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry In press
  55. Parshall MB, Mapel DW, Rice L, Williams A, O’Reilly J: Predictive validity of short-form health survey [36 items] scales for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Heart Lung 2008, 37: 356–365. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.09.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Fitzgerald PB, Hoy K, McQueen S, Maller JJ, Herring S, Segrave R, Bailey M, Been G, Kulkarni J, Daskalakis ZJ: A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34: 1255–1262. 10.1038/npp.2008.233View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hadj Ammar M, Khammouma S, Nasr M: Depressive disorders and quality of life: a cross sectional study including 360 depressive patients followed at the psychiatry consultation of the Mahdia university hospital. Encephale 2008, 34: 256–262. 10.1016/j.encep.2006.11.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kuehner C, Buerger C: Determinants of subjective quality of life in depressed patients: the role of self-esteem, response styles, and social support. J Affect Disord 2005, 86: 205–213. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Warden D, McKinney W, Downing M, Berman SR, Farabaugh A, Luther JF, Nierenberg AA, Callan JA, Sackeim HA: Factors associated with health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a STAR*D report. J Clin Psychiatry 2006, 67: 185–195. 10.4088/JCP.v67n0203View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Brunoni AR, Lopes M, Kaptchuk TJ, Fregni F: Placebo response of non-pharmacological and pharmacological trials in major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4: e4824. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004824PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Furukawa TA: Assessment of mood: guides for clinicians. J Psychosom Res 2010, 68: 581–589. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hiroe T, Kojima M, Yamamoto I, Nojima S, Kinoshita Y, Hashimoto N, Watanabe N, Maeda T, Furukawa TA: Gradations of clinical severity and sensitivity to change assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Japanese patients with depression. Psychiatry Res 2005, 135: 229–235. 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.03.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Dumas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.