Open Access

The impact of urinary incontinence on self-efficacy and quality of life

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes20031:35

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-35

Received: 03 July 2003

Accepted: 22 August 2003

Published: 22 August 2003

Abstract

Urinary incontinence impacts 15 to 35% of the adult ambulatory population. Men after the removal of the prostate for cancer can experience incontinence for several weeks to years after the surgery. Women experience incontinence related to many factors including childbirth, menopause and surgery. It is important that incontinence be treated since it impacts not only the physiological, but also the psychological realms of a person's life. Depression and decreed quality of life have been found to co-occur in the person struggling with incontinence.

Interventions include pharmacological, surgical as well as behavioral interventions. Effective treatment of incontinence should include the use of clinical guidelines and research to promote treatment efficacy.

Urinary Incontinence

Urinary incontinence (UI) impacts an estimated 15 to 35% of the adult ambulatory population 60 and older that live in the community with prevalence rates for women being twice that of men [1, 2]. There is a variance in epidemiological data regarding urinary incontinence (UI) prevalence rates because of inconsistent definitions of incontinence, differences in questionnaires, settings, and methodology, as well as the reliability of self-report data [37, 2]. Also contributing to the variance in reported prevalence may that many sufferers fail to report the occurrence of UI to their health care provider because of the belief that incontinence is a normal phenomena associated with aging or that UI is untreatable. There is also the stigma associated with not being able to control the basic functions of elimination.

Implications

Involuntary loss of urine has multiple implications for the sufferer [6, 8]. Incontinence also has been noted to be a major barrier to social interests, entertainment, or physical recreation [911].

Depression

Depression and anxiety have been suggested to co-occur in incontinent persons [1, 12, 9, 13, 14]. Several researchers have found a link between incontinence and depression [1517]. It is unclear if the incontinence causes depression or if depression causes incontinence. However, it is clear that a relationship exists. Bandura (1977a) proposed that depression will occur when either self-efficacy or outcome expectancy is low. There is thought to be a reciprocal relationship among self-efficacy, performance, and one's emotional state [1820]. Depression is described as "an alteration in mood ranging from a mild sadness to overwhelming despair. It is characterized by feelings of sadness, emptiness, dissatisfaction, lowered self-esteem, inactivity, and self-depreciation" [21].

Depression may be created by personal perception of cognition, negative events, and physiological states. Depression occurs when one feels a perceived inefficacy in controlling valued outcomes [22]. This perception impacts the choice of activities one chooses to engage in and the effort and persistence one is willing to invest in the activity [22, 23]. Self-evaluation of accomplishments are often devalued by those with low self-efficacy because success is based on high performance standards [22]. When outcomes are highly valued, depression is likely when outcome expectancy is high and performance expectation is low [22, 23].

Self-efficacy and Quality of Life

Women with UI are also more likely to report a poorer quality of life [10, 24]. The effect of self-efficacy on quality of life has been investigated in several studies of health related behaviors. Self-efficacy and quality of life are positively related while depression and self-efficacy are negatively related. The choices, goals, effort, and persistence of an individual can be impacted by individual self-efficacy [18, 22]. Interventions that are tailored to increase self-efficacy may improve depression and quality of life.

Financial Impact

The total cost of UI in 1995 was reported to be more than 16.4 billion dollars annually Hu, 1990). Of this total 11.2 billion dollars is spent for community dwelling individuals and an additional 5.2 billion dollars is spent on continence care in the institutional setting [1, 25]. Findings of a study by Baker and Bice (1995) indicated that individuals with UI: 1) suffered more disability; 2) are more likely to use more expensive paraprofessional service and purchase medical equipment; and 3) cost an estimated 25% more to the public in home care costs.

Treatment

Controlling incontinence may be pharmacological, surgical or behavioral in nature. The first line of intervention is recommended to be the least invasive in nature, such as the case in pelvic muscle exercises [1]. Pharmacological agents may also be used in conjunction with pelvic muscle exercises to promote the return to continence. There is a reported 61% increase in continence in women using pelvic exercises as an intervention for incontinence and reported improvements in quality of life.

Treatment of UI is based on a thorough assessment to confirm the presence of UI, the type of UI, identification of contributing factors, and the determination of patients that may require further evaluation prior to any therapeutic interventions.[1]. The information obtained during assessment is also vital in implementing the appropriate treatment for UI. Treatment and interventions for UI are medications, mechanical devices, surgery, and behavioral modification. Several medications have proved beneficial for UI; however the risk to benefit ratio is not clear.[1]. Estrogen replacement therapy may also be useful for UI and has been used in women that have estrogen deficiencies to reduce urgency and frequency of urge UI and in combination with adrenergic agonists to treat stress UI [26, 6]. The side effects of the pharmacological agent used, the characteristics of the UI, and patient and physician preference must all be weighed in the decision to use medications as an intervention [26].

Surgery has also proved to be effective when other interventions for pelvic prolapse, bladder neck, or urethral obstruction fail [26, 27]. Surgery may also be indicated in certain cases of stress UI that are not responsive to pharmacological and behavioral interventions [26]. However, the long-term results of surgery for UI remain under investigation. Mechanical devices such as urethral plugs, weighted vaginal cones, and pessarys have been shown to be effective in selected situations.[1]. Behavioral interventions have also been shown to be successful as a treatment for stress and urge UI [28, 29], although the long-term effects of these therapies also need further study.[1].

Theoretical Models

There are few theoretical models that have been developed to organize data and research results related to incontinence research. Because UI impacts the social, physiological and psychological domains, the models used must be holistic in nature. One model that has been described is self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is described as the personal judgments one makes about ability to execute courses of action in a particular set of situations [18, 23]. Social Cognitive Theory was the foundation from which self-efficacy theory was derived. Self-efficacy theory proposes that outcomes are determined by one's actions. One's perception of capabilities will impact how one behaves, the level of motivation, thought patterns, and emotional reactions in taxing situations [18, 19]. The measurement of self-efficacy for the performance of pelvic muscle exercises as a behavioral intervention for UI can provide important information regarding one's motivation and belief about the efficacy of the prescribed intervention. The measurement of self-efficacy may also provide a foundation for better understanding the relationship between self-efficacy and successful outcomes [30, 31].

The Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-efficacy Scale was developed using Bandura's self-efficacy theory and has demonstrated utility in predicting success in behavioral interventions for incontinence in women [32, 33]. Testing of the scale in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence is ongoing. To date there no preliminary data describing the relationship between self-efficacy and the success of remediation for post prostatectomy incontinence.

Clinical Care Guidelines

There should be a routine assessment for incontinence in all health care settings.

Practice guidelines should be developed for clinician use.

Emphasize preventative and restorative care.

Develop a multidisciplinary and holistic approach to continence care.

Necessary Research

Conduct research on comparing intervention effectiveness.

Continue research on the impact of self-efficacy on outcomes.

Conduct longitudinal studies to evaluate interventions.

Evaluate continence outcomes on self-efficacy, depression and quality of life.

Conduct studies on interventions for men with incontinence.

Conduct research in minority populations.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of South Alabama College of Nursing

References

  1. Research Agency for Health Care Policy and: Clinical practice guideline: Urinary incontinence in adults: Acute and chronic management. Rockville,MD, U.S. Government Printing Office 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Thom DH: Overactive bladder: Epidemiology and impact on quality of life. 2000. [http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0m/0BGG/8_45/65195580/p1/article.jhtml]Google Scholar
  3. Abrams P: Incontinence: Proceeding from the second international consultation on incontinence. Plymouth, UK, Health Publications 2001.Google Scholar
  4. Diokno C, Brock BM, Brown MB, Herzog AR: Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstutionalized elderly. The Journal of Urology 1986, 136: 1022–1025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mohide EA: The prevalence and scope of urinary incontinence. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 1986, 2: 639–655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Conference National Institutes of Health Urinary Incontinence Consensus: Urinary incontinence in adults. Journal of the American Medical Association 1989, 261: 2685–2690. 10.1001/jama.261.18.2685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Resnick N, Beckett L, Branch L, Scherr P, Wetle T: Short-term variability of self-report incontinence in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1994, 42: 202–207.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ouslander J, Schnelle J: Incontinence in the nursing home. American College of Physicians 1995, 122: 438–449.Google Scholar
  9. Grimby A, Milson I, Molander U, Wiklund I, Ekelund P: The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age and Aging 1993, 22: 82–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunskaar S,, Vinsnes A: The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. The American Geriatrics Society 1991, 39: 378–382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wetle T, Scherr P, Branch LG, Resnick NM, Harris T, Evans D, Taylor JO: Difficulty with holding urine among older persons in a geographically defined community: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1995, 43: 349–355.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgio KL, Whitehead WE, Engel BT: Urinary incontinence in the elderly: Bladder-sphincter biofeedback and toilet training skills. Annals of Internal Medicine 1985, 104: 507–515.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. MacCauley AJ, Stern RS, Holmes DM, Stanton SL: Micturition and the mind: Psychological factors in the aetiology and treatment of urinary symptoms in women. British Medical Journal 1984, 294: 540–543.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosenzweig BA, Hischke D, Thomas S, Nelson AL, Bhatia NN: Stress incontinence in women: Psychological status before and after treatment. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1991, 36: 835–838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Meade-D'Alisera P, Merriweather T, Wentland M, Fantl M, Ghafar M: Depressive symptoms in women with urinary incontinence: A prospective study. Urologic Nursing 2001, 21: 397–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Watson AJ, Currie L, Curran S, Jarvis GJ: A perspective study examining the association between the symptoms of anxiety and depression and severity of urinary incontinence. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology 2000, 88: 7–9. 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00122-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zorn BH, Montgomery H, Poeper K, Gray M, Steers WD: Urinary incontinence and depression. Journal of Urology 1999, 162: 82–84. 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00020PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977, 84: 194–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bandura A: Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Yusaf SO,, Kavanagh DJ: Mechanisms of improvement in treatment for depression: Test of a self-efficacy and performance model. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly 1990, 4: 51–70.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis S, Grainger RD: Manual of psychosocial nursing interventions: Promoting mental health in medical-surgical settings. The patient with depression Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co. 1989.Google Scholar
  22. Bandura A: Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist 1982, 37: 122–147. 10.1037//0003-066X.37.2.122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Bandura A: Social foundations of theory and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Wyman JF, Harkins S, Choi S, Taylor JR, Fantl A: Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1987, 70: 378–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagner TH, Hu TW: Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 1998, 51: 355–361. 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00623-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kane RL, Ouslander JG, Abrass: Incontinence. Essentials of clinical geriatrics 3 Edition New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc 1994.Google Scholar
  27. McCormick KA, Newman DK, Colling J, Pearson BD: Urinary incontinence in adults. American Journal of Nursing 1992, 92: 75–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Burgio K, Courtland-Robinson J, Engel B: The role of biofeedback in Kegel exercises training for stress urinary incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1986, 154: 58–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. McDowell BJ, Burgio K, Dombrowski M, Locher J, Rodriguez E: An interdisciplinary approach to the assessment and behavioral treatment of urinary incontinence in geriatric outpatients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1992, 40: 370–374.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Grembowski D, Patrick D, Diehr P, Durham M, Beresford S, Kay E, Hecht J: Self-efficacy and health behavior among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1993, 34: 89–103.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hofstetter CR, Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Bryon M, Jones S, Rummanni S, Scott K, Wagers, Weiss D: Some health dimensions of self-efficacy: Analysis of theoretical specificity. Social Science and Medicine 1990, 31: 1051–1056. 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90118-CPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Broome B: Psychometric analysis of the Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-efficacy Scale in African-American women with incontinence. Urologic Nursing 2001, 21: 289–297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Broome B: Development and testing of a scale to measure self-efficacy for pelvic muscle exercises in women with urinary incontinence 19(4), 258–268. Urologic Nursing 1999, 19: 258–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Broome; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement